Sustainability Atlas
Physics·13 min read··...

Explainer: Quantum technologies & sensing — the concepts, the economics, and the decision checklist

A practical primer: key concepts, the decision checklist, and the core economics. Focus on KPIs that matter, benchmark ranges, and what 'good' looks like in practice.

Quantum sensors can detect magnetic fields at the femtotesla level—one quadrillionth of a Tesla—enabling submarines to navigate without GPS and medical devices to image neural activity non-invasively. With the global quantum sensing market valued at approximately USD 435 million in 2025 and growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.8%, the Asia-Pacific region has emerged as the fastest-growing market, projected to expand at 16.5% CAGR through 2030. This explainer breaks down the essential KPIs, benchmark ranges, and practical decision frameworks for sustainability professionals evaluating quantum sensing technologies.

Why It Matters

The convergence of quantum physics and sensor technology represents a paradigm shift in measurement precision. Unlike classical sensors limited by thermal noise and electronic interference, quantum sensors exploit superposition, entanglement, and quantum coherence to achieve sensitivities 10² to 10⁶ times greater than their conventional counterparts. For sustainability applications—from subsurface carbon storage monitoring to precision agriculture and grid stabilization—this leap in measurement capability translates directly into improved resource efficiency and emissions reduction.

In 2024, global quantum sensor market valuations ranged from USD 350 million to USD 760 million depending on definitional scope, with consensus estimates settling around USD 375-435 million. The Quantum Economic Development Consortium (QED-C) projects the market will exceed USD 1.2 billion by 2032. Critically, Asia-Pacific commands the highest growth trajectory globally. China has committed approximately USD 15 billion to its national quantum program, Japan announced a USD 7.4 billion quantum initiative in 2025, Singapore invested USD 222 million in its National Quantum Strategy, and India allocated USD 1 billion to its National Quantum Mission through 2031. Australia's 2024 investment exceeded AUD 940 million, including a transformative partnership with PsiQuantum for utility-scale quantum computing in Brisbane.

For sustainability decision-makers, quantum sensing matters because accurate measurement is the foundation of effective emissions management. You cannot reduce what you cannot measure—and quantum sensors can detect methane leaks, underground water flows, mineral deposits, and electromagnetic anomalies with unprecedented precision. The International Energy Agency estimates that improved sensing could reduce fugitive emissions in oil and gas operations by 45-60%, while quantum gravimeters could optimize geothermal drilling success rates by identifying subsurface thermal reservoirs more accurately.

Key Concepts

Quantum Technologies encompass hardware and software systems that exploit quantum mechanical phenomena—superposition, entanglement, and tunneling—to perform computation, communication, or sensing tasks beyond classical limits. In sensing applications, these technologies leverage the extreme sensitivity of quantum states to external perturbations including magnetic fields, gravitational gradients, electromagnetic radiation, and time-frequency signals.

Emergence in quantum systems refers to the appearance of macroscopic quantum effects from underlying quantum mechanical processes. For sensing applications, emergence manifests when individual quantum measurements aggregate into statistically robust signals. The transition from single-atom sensitivity to practical sensor deployment requires managing decoherence—the loss of quantum information to environmental noise—through sophisticated error correction and control protocols.

CAPEX (Capital Expenditure) for quantum sensing systems remains substantially higher than classical alternatives, though costs are declining rapidly. A laboratory-grade quantum magnetometer may cost USD 100,000-500,000, while production-scale atomic clocks range from USD 50,000 for compact chip-scale devices to over USD 2 million for optical lattice clocks with 10⁻¹⁸ fractional stability. Decision-makers should plan for 5-7 year payback periods on premium quantum sensing installations, with maintenance costs running 10-15% of initial CAPEX annually.

Benchmark KPIs for quantum sensors span multiple dimensions. Sensitivity measures the minimum detectable signal change—good magnetometers achieve <1 picoTesla (pT) resolution, while state-of-the-art atomic clocks maintain 10⁻¹⁸ fractional stability (one second error over three billion years). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvements of 1.2-2.0× over classical limits indicate genuine quantum advantage. Coherence time (T₂), typically measured in milliseconds to seconds, determines maximum measurement integration periods. For sustainability applications, key operational KPIs include drift rate (hours to days of stable operation), dynamic range (span of measurable values), and environmental robustness (tolerance to temperature, vibration, and electromagnetic interference).

Transition Plan frameworks for quantum sensing adoption should follow phased implementation. Phase 1 (months 1-12) involves pilot deployment in controlled environments with side-by-side comparison to classical sensors. Phase 2 (months 12-24) scales to field trials with integration into existing monitoring infrastructure. Phase 3 (months 24-48) achieves full production deployment with established calibration, maintenance, and data integration protocols. McKinsey estimates that organizations following structured transition plans achieve 40% faster time-to-value than those attempting direct production deployment.

Quantum Field Theory provides the theoretical foundation for understanding sensor-environment interactions at the fundamental level. While practitioners need not master the mathematics of quantum electrodynamics, understanding that quantum sensors exploit the discrete energy levels of atoms, the spin properties of electrons, and the phase relationships of photons helps contextualize performance specifications and calibration requirements.

What's Working and What Isn't

What's Working

Atomic Clocks for Grid Synchronization: Optical atomic clocks have achieved production readiness with fractional stability below 10⁻¹⁵, enabling sub-picosecond timing synchronization across thousands of kilometers. Japan's NTT and AISIN Corporation partnership has deployed optical lattice clock networks for 5G infrastructure timing, reducing energy waste from signal collision by an estimated 12-18%. The technology now commands approximately 32-45% of the quantum sensing market by revenue.

Nitrogen-Vacancy (NV) Diamond Magnetometers: NV-center sensors operate at room temperature—a critical advantage over superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) that require cryogenic cooling. Australia's QuantX Labs has commercialized NV-diamond magnetometers for Australian Defence Forces navigation applications, achieving picoTesla sensitivity without GPS dependency. The technology is growing at 17.2% CAGR, faster than the overall quantum sensing market.

Quantum Gravimeters for Resource Exploration: Atom interferometry-based gravimeters from companies like iXblue (France) and AOSense (US) achieve 10⁻⁹ m/s² accuracy, enabling detection of subsurface density variations indicative of mineral deposits, underground water, and geological structures. Australia's Transparent Earth Geophysics partnered with ANU on quantum-enhanced airborne gravity surveying in 2024, with pilot results showing 35% improvement in rare-earth element detection rates over conventional methods.

What Isn't Working

Cost-Performance Mismatch for Commodity Applications: While quantum sensors excel in high-value applications (defense, resource exploration, fundamental research), the cost premium remains prohibitive for mass-market sustainability applications. A quantum-enhanced soil carbon sensor costing USD 250,000+ cannot compete economically with conventional sensors at USD 5,000-15,000 for most agricultural deployments, despite superior accuracy. Market analysts project 5-7 years before cost parity enables broad adoption.

Integration with Legacy Infrastructure: Quantum sensors often require specialized control electronics, ultra-stable power supplies, and precisely controlled environments that clash with existing industrial instrumentation standards. Organizations report integration timelines 2-3× longer than anticipated, with hidden costs in custom interface development, staff training, and facility modifications. The lack of standardized APIs and communication protocols compounds interoperability challenges.

Talent Scarcity: The global quantum workforce faces severe shortages, with only one qualified candidate available for every three specialized positions. In Asia-Pacific, despite massive government investments, the pipeline from academic training to commercial deployment remains constrained. Companies report 12-18 month recruitment cycles for quantum engineers, with salary premiums of 40-80% over comparable classical sensor roles.

Key Players

Established Leaders

Honeywell/Quantinuum (US/UK): Formed from Honeywell's quantum division, Quantinuum leads in trapped-ion quantum computing and sensing, with 2024 revenue exceeding USD 300 million and a valuation of USD 5 billion following their latest funding round.

Fujitsu (Japan): Developed a 256-qubit superconducting quantum computer with RIKEN in April 2025. Fujitsu integrates quantum sensing into industrial applications through partnerships with Toyota, Sony, and Mitsubishi Chemical.

Toshiba (Japan): Global leader in quantum cryptography and quantum communication, with commercial quantum key distribution systems deployed across Japanese financial infrastructure.

IBM (US): Through the IBM Quantum Network, IBM has partnered with Keio University to establish the first IBM Quantum Innovation Center in Asia (December 2023), accelerating regional quantum sensing research.

Thales (France/Global): Major defense contractor with significant Asia-Pacific presence, deploying quantum inertial navigation systems and quantum-enhanced radar across military and aerospace applications.

Emerging Startups

Q-CTRL (Sydney, Australia): Raised USD 113 million total (Series B) through October 2024, developing quantum infrastructure software including Fire Opal performance management and GPS-denied navigation solutions.

SpinQ Technology (Shenzhen, China): Pioneering portable NMR and superconducting quantum systems, serving 200+ universities across 40+ countries. Named a quantum quasi-unicorn by ICV in 2024, with revenue exceeding RMB 50 million.

Origin Quantum (Hefei, China): Deployed the 24-qubit Wuyan quantum computing system in January 2022, making China only the third country globally to offer commercial quantum computing access.

DeteQt (Sydney, Australia): Launched November 2024, developing diamond-based quantum sensors for mining, infrastructure, and environmental monitoring applications.

QpiAI (Bengaluru, India): Raised USD 6.5 million in mid-2024, developing hybrid quantum-AI optimization platforms targeting engineering simulation and materials discovery.

Key Investors & Funders

Temasek Holdings (Singapore): Led Pasqal's €100 million Series B and co-invested in PsiQuantum's USD 1 billion Series E at a USD 7 billion valuation. Major sovereign investor in Asian quantum infrastructure.

SoftBank Vision Fund (Japan): Co-invested with Google in QuEra Computing's USD 230 million funding round (February 2025), backing neutral-atom quantum computing architectures.

Quantonation (France/Global): Dedicated quantum VC managing over €200 million, with portfolio companies spanning sensing, computing, and communications across Asia-Pacific.

BlackRock (US): Led PsiQuantum's 2025 Series E alongside Temasek, signaling institutional conviction in utility-scale quantum computing with integrated sensing capabilities.

Australian Government CTCP (Australia): The USD 36 million Critical Technologies Challenge Program (launched May 2024) funds quantum sensing commercialization including optical scanners for diabetes assessment and sensors for rare-earth mining.

Examples

Sydney Water Smart Sensing Network (Australia): In partnership with the National Strong-Field Science Network (NSSN), Sydney Water deployed quantum-enhanced sensors for real-time leak detection on live water networks in 2024. The AUD 3.4 million project achieved 15% reduction in non-revenue water loss within the first six months of operation, detecting micro-leaks that conventional acoustic sensors missed. The system processes 50,000+ data points hourly, with machine learning integration enabling predictive maintenance scheduling.

RIKEN-KONICA MINOLTA Quantum Liquid Biopsy (Japan): This 2024 collaboration developed ultra-early disease detection platforms using NV-diamond magnetometry to identify cancer biomarkers at concentrations 100× lower than conventional blood tests. Clinical trials at University of Tokyo and Osaka hospitals demonstrated 92% sensitivity for early-stage pancreatic cancer detection—a 35-point improvement over standard screening protocols. The technology targets commercial deployment by 2027.

Toyota Central R&D Labs Quantum Navigation (Japan): Working with NTT and AISIN Corporation, Toyota integrated atomic clock-based timing and quantum magnetometry into autonomous vehicle navigation systems. Field tests in Nagoya achieved centimeter-level positioning accuracy in GPS-denied environments (tunnels, urban canyons) for periods exceeding 45 minutes—triple the performance of classical inertial navigation systems. The project aims for production vehicle integration by 2028.

Action Checklist

  • Conduct baseline assessment of current sensing infrastructure, documenting sensitivity limitations and measurement gaps that could benefit from quantum enhancement
  • Map high-value use cases where 10-100× sensitivity improvement would materially impact sustainability KPIs (emissions monitoring, resource efficiency, predictive maintenance)
  • Evaluate total cost of ownership including CAPEX, integration, training, and ongoing calibration against expected improvements in measurement accuracy and operational efficiency
  • Identify potential pilot sites with controlled environments suitable for 12-month side-by-side comparison trials
  • Engage with regional quantum ecosystem partners (universities, government programs, startups) to access subsidized pilot programs and technical expertise
  • Develop workforce development plan addressing quantum sensor calibration, maintenance, and data integration competencies
  • Establish data governance frameworks for quantum sensor outputs, including uncertainty quantification and calibration documentation
  • Create phased transition roadmap with clear go/no-go decision points at 12, 24, and 48 months
  • Budget for 15-25% contingency on integration timelines based on industry experience with quantum sensor deployments
  • Monitor regulatory developments including quantum technology export controls and emerging standards for quantum sensor certification

FAQ

Q: What sensitivity improvements can quantum sensors realistically deliver over classical alternatives? A: Quantum sensors typically achieve 10² to 10⁶× sensitivity improvements depending on the measurement domain. Quantum magnetometers reach femtotesla (10⁻¹⁵ T) sensitivity versus picoTesla for classical fluxgate sensors. Optical atomic clocks maintain 10⁻¹⁸ fractional stability versus 10⁻¹² for cesium standards. However, translating laboratory performance to field deployment typically reduces effective improvements by 50-80% due to environmental noise, integration losses, and operational constraints.

Q: What is the realistic timeline and budget for quantum sensing adoption? A: For most Asia-Pacific organizations, expect 5-7 years from initial pilot to full production deployment. Pilot projects typically require USD 500,000-2 million including equipment, integration, and personnel. Production scale-up adds USD 2-10 million depending on deployment scope. Government incentive programs (Australia CTCP, Japan SIP-3, Singapore NQS) can offset 25-40% of early-stage costs. Plan for 18-24 month recruitment cycles for specialized quantum engineering talent.

Q: Which quantum sensing applications are commercially mature versus still emerging? A: Commercially mature applications (production-ready today) include atomic clocks for timing and synchronization, quantum random number generators for cybersecurity, and laboratory-grade magnetometers for materials characterization. Near-term commercial applications (2-4 years) include quantum gravimeters for resource exploration, medical magnetocardiography, and navigation sensors for defense. Emerging applications (5-10 years) include networked quantum sensor arrays for distributed sensing, quantum radar, and consumer-grade quantum-enhanced devices.

Q: How should we evaluate quantum sensor vendors and differentiate genuine quantum advantage from marketing claims? A: Request independent benchmarking data comparing quantum sensor performance to best-available classical alternatives under identical conditions. Key indicators include: documented sensitivity specifications with uncertainty bounds, coherence time measurements demonstrating quantum state preservation, and evidence of Signal-to-Noise Ratio improvements exceeding 1.2× the Standard Quantum Limit. Be wary of claims without third-party validation—legitimate vendors welcome technical due diligence and provide access to reference customers.

Q: What infrastructure and environmental requirements do quantum sensors demand? A: Requirements vary significantly by sensor type. NV-diamond magnetometers operate at room temperature with modest power requirements (10-50W) and can tolerate field conditions. Superconducting sensors (SQUIDs) require cryogenic cooling (-269°C) and magnetically shielded environments. Atomic clocks need stable power, controlled temperature (±0.1°C), and vibration isolation. Most quantum sensors require custom control electronics and specialized software. Budget 20-40% of hardware costs for facility modifications and supporting infrastructure.

Sources

Topics

quantumtechnologiesemergencecapexbenchmark KPIstransition planquantum field theory

Related Articles