Mobility & Built Environment·11 min read··...

Freight & Logistics Decarbonization KPIs by Sector

Essential KPIs for logistics decarbonization, with 2024-2025 benchmark ranges for emissions intensity, fleet electrification, and modal shift across supply chain segments.

Freight transport accounts for 8% of global CO2 emissions and is growing faster than most other sectors. Road freight alone contributes 7% of global energy-related emissions. Yet logistics decarbonization has lagged passenger transport, with most fleet operators still running conventional diesel. This benchmark deck provides the KPIs that matter for freight decarbonization, with ranges drawn from 2024-2025 implementations across logistics segments.

The Decarbonization Challenge

Freight emissions are stubbornly difficult to reduce. Unlike passenger EVs where economics now favor electrification, commercial vehicles face: higher upfront costs, longer payback periods, infrastructure gaps, and operational constraints that vary by use case.

The regulatory push is accelerating. California's Advanced Clean Fleets rule mandates zero-emission medium and heavy trucks for large fleets starting 2024. EU CO2 standards require 45% emissions reduction for new trucks by 2030. Major shippers (Amazon, IKEA, Unilever) are demanding emissions data and setting Scope 3 reduction targets.

The good news: technology options are expanding. Battery electric trucks are viable for regional haul and urban delivery. Hydrogen fuel cells address long-haul needs. Operational efficiencies and modal shift can reduce emissions immediately. Understanding what works where—and measuring progress—is essential.

The 8 KPIs That Matter

1. Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/tonne-km)

Definition: Greenhouse gas emissions per unit of freight transport activity.

ModeAverage IntensityBest PracticeZero-Emission Potential
Road (LTL)80-120 gCO2e/tkm50-70Electric: 5-15 (grid-dependent)
Road (FTL)50-80 gCO2e/tkm35-50Electric: 3-10
Road (Last Mile)200-400 gCO2e/tkm100-180Electric: 10-40
Rail (Diesel)20-35 gCO2e/tkm15-22Electric: 2-8
Rail (Electric)5-15 gCO2e/tkm3-8Already low
Maritime (Container)8-15 gCO2e/tkm5-10Methanol/ammonia: 3-8
Air Freight500-900 gCO2e/tkm400-550SAF: 200-400

GLEC Framework: The Global Logistics Emissions Council framework provides standardized methodology for logistics emissions calculation. Adoption improves comparability but requires data granularity many operators lack.

2. Fleet Electrification Rate

Definition: Percentage of fleet vehicles that are zero-emission (battery electric or fuel cell).

Vehicle CategoryCurrent MedianLeading Fleets2030 Target (Ambitious)
Light Commercial (<3.5t)5-12%25-45%50-70%
Medium Trucks (3.5-16t)1-4%8-18%25-40%
Heavy Trucks (>16t, Regional)0.5-2%5-12%20-35%
Heavy Trucks (>16t, Long-Haul)<0.5%2-5%10-20%
Delivery Vans8-18%35-60%60-80%
Transit Buses15-35%50-80%80-100%

Regional variation: China leads heavy truck electrification (7%+ of new sales); Europe follows (3-5%); US lags (<2%). Battery costs and policy support drive differences.

3. Fleet Utilization and Efficiency

Definition: Operational metrics that reduce emissions per shipment regardless of powertrain.

Efficiency MetricIndustry AverageTop QuartileMaximum Achievable
Load Factor (FTL)65-75%82-90%~95%
Empty Miles25-35%12-18%<10%
Average Speed40-50 km/h55-65 km/hRoute-dependent
Fuel Economy (Diesel)30-35 L/100km24-28 L/100km22-25 L/100km
Idle Time15-30% of operating hours5-12%<5%

Efficiency gains compound: Improving load factor from 70% to 85% reduces emissions per shipment by 18%. Combining efficiency measures can cut emissions 25-40% before technology transitions.

4. Modal Shift Achievement

Definition: Percentage of freight shifted from higher to lower-emission modes.

Shift TypeEmissions ReductionCurrent AchievementBarriers
Road → Rail70-85%5-12% of eligibleInfrastructure, transit time
Road → Waterway60-80%3-8% of eligibleGeography, handling costs
Air → Ocean95%+15-25% of eligibleTransit time, perishability
Road (Long) → Road (Short) + Rail50-70%8-15% of eligibleTransshipment costs

Intermodal growth: Rail intermodal volumes are growing 3-5% annually in North America and Europe. Container terminals and scheduling improvements are enabling shift, but last-mile road dependency remains.

5. Alternative Fuel Adoption

Definition: Penetration of low-carbon fuels in fleet operations.

Fuel TypeCarbon ReductionCurrent Fleet ShareReadiness
Biodiesel (B20-B100)15-80%5-12%Commercially available
Renewable Diesel (HVO)60-90%3-8%Supply-constrained
CNG/LNG10-25%2-6%Declining interest
Bio-CNG/Bio-LNG70-90%<1%Niche applications
Hydrogen (Gray)-10% to +20%<0.1%Not recommended
Hydrogen (Green)85-95%<0.1%Early pilots
Electric60-95% (grid-dependent)2-8%Scaling rapidly

Fuel availability challenge: Even where vehicles are available, low-carbon fuel supply is constrained. Renewable diesel and green hydrogen face significant supply gaps.

6. Last-Mile Decarbonization

Definition: Emissions reduction in urban and suburban delivery segments.

SolutionEmissions ReductionDeployment RateSuitable Conditions
Electric Vans60-90%15-35% (urban fleets)Depot-based, <200 km/day
Cargo Bikes95-100%3-8% of urban parcels<5 km, <25 kg packages
Micro-Hubs + Walking95-100%1-4% of dense urbanHigh-density cores
Autonomous Delivery60-90% (if electric)<1%Pilot stage
Consolidated Delivery30-50%5-15%Willing shippers

Last-mile economics: Urban delivery costs $5-15 per parcel; cargo bikes and consolidated delivery can reduce costs while cutting emissions. Electric vans achieve cost parity in high-utilization urban routes.

7. Scope 3 Logistics Emissions Tracking

Definition: Completeness and accuracy of shipper emissions data from logistics providers.

Tracking LevelDescriptionShipper Adoption
Carrier-Specific MeasuredActual fuel/energy per shipment5-10%
Carrier-Reported AverageProvider-level emission factors15-25%
Mode-Based EstimatesDefault factors by transport mode35-45%
Spend-Based$ spend × industry factors25-35%
None/UnknownNo logistics emissions tracked10-20%

Data quality gap: Most shippers rely on estimates rather than measured data. GLEC Framework and emerging carrier reporting standards aim to improve but adoption lags.

8. Customer Decarbonization Premium

Definition: Price premium shippers pay for verified low-carbon logistics.

Premium LevelCustomer TypeJustification
0% (No Premium)Most B2BCarbon not yet priced
1-3%ESG-focused corporatesScope 3 targets
3-7%Premium consumer brandsMarketing value
7-15%Sustainability leadersStrategic commitment
15%+Regulated/Premium nicheCompliance, differentiation

Premium reality check: Despite stated willingness-to-pay, most shippers resist logistics premiums. Verified emissions data and transparent pricing are prerequisites for premium realization.

What's Working in 2024-2025

Urban Electric Fleet Deployment

Amazon's 10,000+ electric delivery vans, FedEx's commitment to all-electric pickup and delivery fleet by 2040, and UPS's 13,000 electric vehicles demonstrate viability. Key success factors: depot-based operations enabling overnight charging, routes under 150 miles, and sufficient package density to justify vehicle investment.

Reported metrics: 40% fuel cost savings, 25% maintenance cost reduction, 60-90% emissions reduction depending on grid.

Digital Freight Matching

Platforms like Convoy, Loadsmart, and Uber Freight reduce empty miles by matching available capacity with freight demand. Technology-enabled operators report 15-20% reduction in empty miles versus traditional brokerage.

Scaling challenges: adoption requires shipper flexibility on timing and carrier willingness to share data. Market fragmentation limits network effects.

Shipper Collaboration Programs

Multi-shipper collaboration (shared warehousing, consolidated shipments, synchronized networks) achieves efficiency gains impossible for individual companies. Projects like the Logistics Council report 15-30% efficiency improvements through collaboration.

Barriers: competitive concerns, IT integration, governance complexity. Works best within industry verticals or geographic clusters.

What Isn't Working

Hydrogen Hype for Near-Term Trucking

Despite substantial investment in hydrogen fuel cell trucks, deployment remains minimal (<1,000 trucks globally). Challenges: hydrogen cost ($10-15/kg vs. target $3-4), fueling infrastructure gaps, and improving battery electric competition. Most industry observers now expect battery electric to dominate medium and regional heavy trucks, with hydrogen limited to long-haul applications.

Carbon Offset Reliance

Many logistics providers offer "carbon neutral" shipping through offset purchases rather than operational emissions reduction. This approach faces credibility challenges as offset quality comes under scrutiny. Leading shippers now prioritize actual emissions reduction over offsets, with offsets accepted only for residual emissions after reduction measures.

Infrastructure Chicken-and-Egg

Electric truck adoption is slowed by charging infrastructure gaps; infrastructure investment waits for truck demand. Public charging for commercial vehicles remains minimal. Depot charging works for return-to-base operations but limits operational flexibility.

Key Players

Established Leaders

  • Maersk — Shipping decarbonization leader with 25 methanol vessels. Net-zero by 2040 target.
  • FedEx — 2040 carbon neutrality target with EV fleet investments.
  • UPS — $1B+ invested in alternative fuel vehicles and charging infrastructure.
  • DHL — GoGreen Plus program with sustainable aviation fuel options.

Emerging Startups

  • Einride — Autonomous electric freight trucks. Operating in US and Europe.
  • Waabi — AI-powered autonomous trucking. Raised $200M+ from Khosla Ventures.
  • Locomation — Autonomous trucking platooning technology.
  • Xos — Electric commercial vehicles for last-mile delivery.

Key Investors & Funders

  • Amazon Climate Pledge Fund — Backing electric delivery innovation.
  • Khosla Ventures — Major investor in autonomous and electric trucking.
  • Uber Freight — Investing in logistics decarbonization technology.

Examples

IKEA Logistics Decarbonization: Committed to zero-emission last-mile deliveries in all major markets by 2025. Progress: 15-25% of deliveries now electric across Europe. Approach: owned fleet electrification + carrier requirements. Investment: €100M+ in vehicles and charging infrastructure.

Maersk ECO Delivery: Ocean carrier offers verified low-carbon shipping using biofuel blends. Premium: approximately 15% above standard rates. Uptake: 200+ customers including H&M, Disney, Microsoft. Verification: third-party audited fuel consumption and emissions. Demonstrates premium market exists for verified decarbonization.

Union Pacific Intermodal Growth: Rail carrier invested $2B+ in intermodal facilities, capturing road-to-rail shift. Results: 6% intermodal volume growth annually, 70% lower emissions versus trucking. Key enabler: transit time improvements making rail competitive for time-sensitive freight.

Action Checklist

  • Baseline fleet and logistics emissions using GLEC Framework methodology
  • Assess electrification feasibility by route type, return-to-base pattern, and daily mileage
  • Evaluate modal shift opportunities for long-haul, high-volume lanes
  • Implement telematics and route optimization for operational efficiency gains
  • Require emissions data from logistics providers as supplier requirement
  • Set decarbonization targets aligned with Science Based Targets for transport
  • Pilot electric vehicles in suitable urban and regional applications
  • Collaborate with shippers/carriers on network efficiency improvements

FAQ

Q: When will electric trucks achieve TCO parity? A: For urban delivery and return-to-base applications, parity exists now in markets with high fuel costs and available incentives. For regional trucks, parity expected 2025-2027. For long-haul heavy trucks, parity may require 2028-2032 depending on battery cost and charging infrastructure development.

Q: How do I collect emissions data from carriers? A: Start with your top 10-20 carriers by spend—they represent 60-80% of logistics emissions. Request GLEC-compliant emissions factors or shipment-level data. For carriers without data, use mode-based default factors as interim. Build data requirements into procurement criteria.

Q: Should we invest in our own fleet or rely on contracted carriers? A: Depends on control needs and capital capacity. Owned fleets enable faster technology transition but require investment and operational expertise. Contracted carriers shift responsibility but limit control. Hybrid approach: own fleet for core routes, contracted for flexibility. Regardless, include emissions requirements in contracts.

Q: How do I prioritize decarbonization investments across modes? A: Prioritize by: (1) emissions magnitude—address highest-emission segments first; (2) technology readiness—urban delivery electrification is ready now, long-haul hydrogen isn't; (3) cost-effectiveness—efficiency gains often cheaper than technology transitions; (4) strategic value—early action in visible segments (last-mile) provides marketing and learning benefits.

Sources

  • International Energy Agency (IEA), "Trucks and Buses: Tracking Clean Energy Progress," 2024
  • Global Logistics Emissions Council (GLEC), "GLEC Framework 3.0," 2024
  • Smart Freight Centre, "Global Logistics Emissions Benchmarking Report," 2024
  • California Air Resources Board, "Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation," Implementation Update 2024
  • McKinsey & Company, "Decarbonizing Freight Transport," September 2024
  • European Environment Agency, "Road Transport CO2 Emissions," 2024
  • Amazon Sustainability Report, "Last Mile Electrification Progress," 2024

Related Articles