Sustainability Atlas
Circular Economy·15 min read··...

Interview: the builder's playbook for Recycling systems & material recovery — hard-earned lessons

A practitioner conversation: what surprised them, what failed, and what they'd do differently. Focus on KPIs that matter, benchmark ranges, and what 'good' looks like in practice.

Global recycling rates hover stubbornly at 9.1% of the 2.3 billion tonnes of municipal solid waste generated annually, yet the recycling technology market is projected to reach $82.6 billion by 2030, growing at 5.2% CAGR. The paradox reveals a stark reality: material recovery infrastructure has failed to keep pace with consumption, while pioneering companies are demonstrating that AI-powered sorting, advanced chemical recycling, and extended producer responsibility schemes can fundamentally reshape the economics of waste. We spoke with practitioners across MRFs, chemical recyclers, and circular procurement teams to understand what actually works—and what hard lessons they've paid to learn.

The material recovery sector is undergoing its most significant transformation since the introduction of single-stream recycling in the 1990s. From AMP Robotics deploying 400+ AI sorting systems globally to Eastman's $1 billion molecular recycling facility in Kingsport, Tennessee, the infrastructure buildout is accelerating. But success requires navigating contamination economics, regulatory fragmentation, and offtake market volatility that have defeated well-funded efforts before.

Why It Matters

The circular economy represents a $4.5 trillion global opportunity by 2030, with material recovery serving as the critical infrastructure enabling that transition. Yet current systems capture only a fraction of recoverable value: the Ellen MacArthur Foundation estimates that 95% of plastic packaging value—$80-120 billion annually—is lost after first use.

For engineers and procurement teams, the business case extends beyond environmental compliance. Virgin material prices have increased 40-60% since 2020 due to supply chain disruptions, while recycled content mandates are proliferating globally. The EU's Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) requires 65% recycling rates by 2025 and mandates 30% recycled content in plastic packaging by 2030. California's SB 54 mandates 65% source reduction and recycling by 2032.

"We spent years treating recycling as a cost center, subsidising collection with virgin material sales," explains a senior operations director at a major North American MRF operator. "The companies surviving now treat it as a materials manufacturing business. That mental shift changes everything—from equipment investment to quality specifications to customer relationships."

The contamination crisis compounds these challenges. Average contamination rates at US MRFs reached 21% in 2024, up from 15% in 2019. Each percentage point of contamination reduces bale value by 2-3% and increases processing costs. The practitioners who've solved this equation are capturing disproportionate margins as brands scramble to secure verified recycled feedstock.

Key Concepts

Material Recovery Facility (MRF) Economics

Modern MRFs operate on razor-thin margins, with processing costs of $80-150 per tonne and commodity bale values fluctuating 40-60% annually. The fundamental economics depend on three variables: throughput volume, contamination rates, and commodity pricing. Single-stream MRFs processing 400+ tonnes daily achieve 15-20% lower per-tonne costs than smaller facilities, but require $30-50 million capital investments.

"The old model was throughput maximisation—move as many tonnes as possible regardless of quality," notes an engineering manager at Republic Services. "We've flipped to quality maximisation with throughput optimisation. A clean PET bale sells for $800/tonne; a contaminated one might be $200 or unsellable. The sorting equipment pays for itself in bale premiums."

Advanced Sorting Technologies

AI-powered robotic sorting has achieved 95-99% accuracy rates, compared to 85-90% for human sorters, while operating at 70-80 picks per minute continuously. AMP Robotics, ZenRobotics, and Machinex systems combine computer vision with machine learning to identify materials by polymer type, colour, and form factor. Optical sorters using near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy can distinguish between 20+ polymer types at throughputs exceeding 3 metres per second.

"We installed our first AMP system in 2021 and achieved ROI in 14 months," recalls an operations VP at a mid-sized MRF. "The surprise wasn't the sorting accuracy—it was the data. We now know exactly what's in our feedstock by hour, by route, by community. That visibility transformed our contamination reduction programs and our pricing negotiations with haulers."

Chemical Recycling Pathways

Advanced recycling—including pyrolysis, gasification, and depolymerisation—can process contaminated and mixed plastics that mechanical recycling cannot handle. Eastman's polyester renewal technology processes post-consumer waste into virgin-equivalent PET at 1,000+ tonnes per day. PureCycle's purification process produces near-virgin polypropylene from mixed waste streams.

However, energy intensity remains a concern: pyrolysis requires 3-5 MJ/kg compared to 1-2 MJ/kg for mechanical recycling. Mass balance accounting—which allocates recycled content credits across product portfolios—has generated controversy regarding transparency and additionality claims.

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)

EPR schemes shift end-of-life management costs to producers, creating financial incentives for design-for-recyclability. France's CITEO scheme charges modulated fees based on packaging recyclability: mono-material PET bottles pay €0.08/kg while multi-material laminates pay €0.28/kg. Oregon's Plastic Pollution and Recycling Modernization Act, effective 2025, requires producers to fund collection and recycling infrastructure.

What's Working

Republic Services' Polymer Centers

Republic Services' five Polymer Centers represent a new paradigm in plastics recovery, integrating AI sorting, optical characterisation, and quality control to produce food-grade recycled resins. The Las Vegas facility, opened in 2022, processes 45 million pounds annually with 99% purity specifications—meeting beverage-grade requirements for Coca-Cola and PepsiCo supply chains.

"We're not selling bales anymore; we're selling certified, traceable recycled polymers," explains a Republic executive. "The price premium is 30-40% over commodity bales, but the real value is the offtake security. Brands will pay for guaranteed supply and documented provenance."

The Polymer Center model addresses the critical bottleneck in plastics recycling: quality uncertainty. By controlling the entire value chain from collection to finished resin, Republic eliminates the quality degradation that typically occurs across fragmented supply chains.

Eastman Molecular Recycling at Scale

Eastman's Kingsport facility became the world's largest molecular recycling operation when it reached full capacity in 2024, processing 110,000 tonnes of plastic waste annually. The methanolysis process breaks polyester down to monomers—DMT and ethylene glycol—that are repolymerised into virgin-quality PET and specialty polymers.

"We can take carpet, clothing, and contaminated packaging that would otherwise be landfilled and produce material identical to virgin," notes a senior technologist. "The carbon footprint is 20-50% lower than virgin production, depending on feedstock mix and energy source."

Eastman secured $375 million in take-or-pay offtake agreements with L'Oréal, Estée Lauder, and Procter & Gamble before construction began—a financing model that de-risked the investment and demonstrated demand certainty. The company announced a second facility in Longview, Texas, targeting 160,000 tonnes annually by 2026.

France's CITEO Eco-Modulation

France's CITEO system demonstrates how fee modulation can reshape packaging design at scale. Producers pay fees ranging from €0.03/kg for easily recyclable mono-materials to €0.30+/kg for difficult-to-recycle formats. The 10:1 fee differential creates powerful incentives: since implementation, 87% of French beverage bottles transitioned to clear PET (easily recyclable) from coloured variants.

"Eco-modulation works because it speaks the language of brand economics," observes a packaging sustainability consultant. "A €0.02 difference per unit across millions of units gets CFO attention. We've seen clients redesign entire portfolios based on CITEO fee structures."

The scheme achieved 72% packaging recycling rates in 2024—exceeding EU targets—and generated €800 million for collection and sorting infrastructure investment.

What's Not Working

Chemical Recycling Yield Challenges

Despite significant investment, many chemical recycling projects have failed to achieve commercial viability. Plastic Energy's Seville facility, one of Europe's first commercial pyrolysis plants, operated at 30-40% of nameplate capacity for three years due to feedstock quality issues. Brightmark's Ashley, Indiana facility—backed by $260 million in financing—produced less than 10% of projected output in its first two years.

"The fundamental challenge is that pyrolysis works beautifully in the lab with clean, sorted feedstock," explains a chemical engineer who consulted on multiple failed projects. "Real-world mixed plastics contain contaminants—PVC, adhesives, metals—that poison catalysts and corrode equipment. The pre-processing requirements are far more demanding than initial projections assumed."

Yield economics are punishing: commercial pyrolysis typically converts 60-70% of plastic feedstock to usable products, with 20-30% becoming char, wax, or gases. When combined with contamination losses, effective yields can fall below 50%—insufficient to compete with virgin production.

Export Market Collapse

The recycling industry's dependence on export markets created systemic fragility that became apparent when China's National Sword policy (2018) and subsequent Southeast Asian import restrictions eliminated outlets for 90% of US recyclable exports. Mixed paper prices collapsed from $100/tonne to negative values; some MRFs paid $50/tonne to dispose of materials they once sold.

"We had customers whose entire business model was collecting recyclables and containerising them for export," recalls a waste industry consultant. "They had no processing capability, no quality control, no domestic markets. When exports closed, they failed within months."

The export collapse accelerated domestic infrastructure investment—Republic's Polymer Centers, Pratt Industries' paper mills—but revealed how little of the "recycling" system was actually recycling. Studies estimated that 15-25% of materials collected for recycling in 2018 were ultimately landfilled.

Contamination and Consumer Confusion

Despite decades of recycling education, contamination remains the primary cost driver at MRFs. Wishcycling—placing non-recyclable items in recycling bins hoping they'll be recycled—introduces 15-20% of all MRF contamination. Food residue on containers causes rejection of otherwise recyclable materials.

"We've tried education campaigns, enforcement programs, cart tagging, you name it," says a municipal recycling coordinator. "Contamination rates improved maybe 2-3 percentage points over five years. The real solution is upstream: standardised packaging, clear labelling, and deposit return systems that create financial incentives for correct behaviour."

Oregon's bottle deposit expansion to 10 cents (from 5 cents) in 2017 increased redemption rates from 64% to 90%, demonstrating that financial incentives outperform education alone.

MRV and Traceability Gaps

Despite brand commitments to recycled content, verification remains problematic. Mass balance accounting—used in chemical recycling—allows products with no physical recycled content to carry recycled claims. Third-party certification schemes have inconsistent standards and limited audit capacity.

"A CPG brand told me they had 30% recycled content in their bottles. I asked for the chain-of-custody documentation, and they couldn't produce it," recounts a procurement director. "The recycled content was 'calculated' through mass balance across their supplier's entire portfolio. No actual recycled material touched their products."

The EU's Digital Product Passport, required for batteries by 2027 and textiles by 2030, mandates granular material traceability. Blockchain-based platforms like Circularise and Empower are emerging to address verification gaps, but adoption remains limited.

Key Players

Established Leaders

  • Waste Management Inc. — Largest US recycler with 100+ MRFs processing 15 million tonnes annually. Invested $200 million in recycling infrastructure 2020-2024.
  • Republic Services — Operating five Polymer Centers producing food-grade recycled resins. Targeting 4 billion pounds of recycled material by 2030.
  • Veolia — Global leader processing 47 million tonnes of waste annually. Acquired Suez in 2022 for €13 billion, consolidating European market.
  • TOMRA — Norwegian sensor-based sorting technology provider with 100,000+ installations globally. NIR and AI sorting systems deployed across 80+ countries.

Emerging Startups

  • AMP Robotics — AI-powered robotic sorting deployed at 400+ facilities. Raised $99 million Series C in 2023. 95%+ sorting accuracy at 80 picks/minute.
  • Circ — Textile-to-textile recycling using hydrothermal processing. Partnered with Zara, Primark, and Fashion for Good.
  • PureCycle Technologies — PP purification technology producing near-virgin polypropylene. First commercial facility operational in Ironton, Ohio.
  • Samsara Eco — Enzymatic plastic recycling using engineered enzymes to break down PET at ambient temperatures. Backed by Woolworths and Lululemon.

Key Investors & Funders

  • Closed Loop Partners — $900 million under management focused on circular economy infrastructure. Invested in AMP Robotics, Novoloop, and material recovery facilities.
  • Breakthrough Energy Ventures — Bill Gates-backed fund with investments in plastic recycling and waste-to-value technologies.
  • Recycling Partnership — Non-profit funded by CPG brands; deployed $85 million in community recycling grants and contamination reduction programs.
  • European Investment Bank — €1.5 billion Circular Economy Initiative financing MRF upgrades and chemical recycling across Europe.

Action Checklist

  1. Audit your waste streams: Conduct detailed composition studies to understand material flows, contamination sources, and recovery opportunities. Benchmark against industry averages: target <10% contamination for high-value streams.

  2. Specify recycled content with verification: Require chain-of-custody documentation for recycled content claims. Prefer physical recycled content over mass balance allocations. Specify third-party certification (SCS Recycled Content, APR Design Recognition) in procurement specs.

  3. Invest in sorting technology: For MRF operators, AI-powered robotic sorting achieves 14-18 month ROI at facilities processing >200 tonnes daily. Prioritise systems with data analytics capabilities for contamination source identification.

  4. Design for recyclability: Apply APR Design Guide specifications for plastic packaging. Avoid multi-material laminates, problematic adhesives, and non-recyclable components. Use eco-modulation fee structures to model economic impacts of design choices.

  5. Secure offtake agreements: For recyclers, negotiate long-term contracts with brand partners before capacity investment. Eastman's pre-construction offtake model demonstrates how demand certainty enables financing.

  6. Engage with EPR program design: Participate in state and regional EPR rulemaking processes. Advocate for fee modulation that rewards recyclability and funds infrastructure investment.

  7. Implement digital traceability: Pilot blockchain-based chain-of-custody systems for high-value streams. The EU Digital Product Passport creates first-mover advantage for companies with verified material tracking.

  8. Build domestic processing capacity: Reduce export dependence by partnering with or investing in regional processing infrastructure. Vertically integrated models (collection to resin production) capture maximum value.

FAQ

Q: What recycling rate should we target, and how does it compare to industry benchmarks? A: Target rates depend on material stream and regional infrastructure. For developed markets with mature MRF networks, benchmark expectations are: PET bottles 70-80%, HDPE containers 65-75%, cardboard/OCC 85-90%, mixed paper 60-70%, and aluminium 75-85%. Overall MSW recycling in the EU averages 48%, with Germany leading at 67%. The US averages 32%. However, rate calculations vary by methodology—focus on material-specific recovery rates and quality specifications rather than aggregate recycling percentages. Track contamination rates (target <5% for commodity bales) and bale rejection rates (<2% for quality operations) as leading indicators.

Q: When does chemical recycling make economic sense versus mechanical recycling? A: Mechanical recycling should be the default for clean, sorted streams—it's 3-5x more energy-efficient and produces cost-competitive output. Chemical recycling makes sense for: (1) contaminated streams that mechanical processes reject, (2) multi-layer flexible packaging that cannot be mechanically processed, (3) applications requiring virgin-equivalent quality (food contact, medical), and (4) fibre-to-fibre textile recycling. Current economics require feedstock costs below $100/tonne and energy prices below $50/MWh for chemical recycling to compete. Projects with guaranteed offtake from premium brands can tolerate higher costs due to recycled content premiums of 20-40%.

Q: How do we verify recycled content claims and avoid greenwashing risks? A: Implement a three-tier verification approach: First, require physical chain-of-custody documentation showing material flow from collection through processing to final product. Second, specify third-party certification—SCS Recycled Content Certification, APR Design Recognition, or GRS (Global Recycled Standard) for textiles. Third, conduct supplier audits including mass balance calculations, processing capacity verification, and spot-check testing. For chemical recycling claims using mass balance, require ISCC PLUS certification and disclosure of allocation methodology. Emerging blockchain platforms (Circularise, Empower) provide immutable traceability for premium applications.

Q: What's the ROI timeline for AI-powered sorting equipment? A: ROI depends on facility throughput, labour costs, and commodity values. Facilities processing >300 tonnes daily typically achieve 12-18 month payback based on labour reduction alone (one robot replaces 2-3 human sorters at $15-20/hour). Quality improvements—cleaner bales commanding 20-40% premiums—often exceed labour savings. AMP Robotics reports customers achieving 18% revenue increases from bale value improvements. Key success factors include: integration with existing conveyor systems (retrofit vs. greenfield), maintenance capabilities (remote diagnostics reduce downtime), and data utilisation (contamination tracking enables upstream intervention). Start with high-value residue lines where recovery improvements justify capital expenditure.

Q: How should we prepare for upcoming EPR regulations? A: EPR is expanding rapidly: 44 US states have considered EPR legislation since 2020, with Oregon, Maine, Colorado, and California enacting comprehensive packaging laws. Prepare by: (1) auditing your packaging portfolio for recyclability using APR Design Guide criteria, (2) modelling fee exposure under different eco-modulation scenarios (France's CITEO provides useful benchmarks), (3) engaging with Producer Responsibility Organizations (PROs) that will manage compliance, (4) investing in design-for-recyclability to minimise fees and differentiate from competitors, and (5) participating in regulatory development to shape workable requirements. Early movers benefit from lower initial fees (typically 40-60% of mature program rates) and preferential PRO relationships.

Sources

The material recovery sector stands at an inflection point. Companies that invest in advanced sorting, secure reliable offtake, and build verified traceability systems will capture disproportionate value as brands race to meet recycled content mandates. The hard-earned lessons from practitioners are clear: treat recycling as manufacturing, not waste management; prioritise quality over throughput; and build domestic capacity before export dependencies create fragility. The $82.6 billion market opportunity by 2030 will flow to operators who've internalised these lessons and built infrastructure to act on them.

Topics

recyclingmaterialrecycled contentprocurement specsMRVdesign for disassemblytraceability

Related Articles