Myth-busting Chemical recycling & advanced sorting: separating hype from reality
Myths vs. realities, backed by recent evidence and practitioner experience. Focus on implementation trade-offs, stakeholder incentives, and the hidden bottlenecks.
Despite decades of public awareness campaigns, global plastic recycling rates remain stubbornly low—hovering at approximately 9% worldwide, with the UK achieving only 44% collection rates for plastic packaging in 2024. Chemical recycling, long heralded as the solution to plastics that mechanical recycling cannot handle, currently processes less than 1% of global plastic waste. This stark gap between promise and performance reveals an industry caught between genuine technological innovation and strategic greenwashing. Understanding what chemical recycling can realistically deliver—and where AI-powered sorting systems are creating genuine breakthroughs—requires separating evidence-based progress from marketing hyperbole.
Why It Matters
The stakes for getting chemical recycling right extend far beyond environmental stewardship. By late 2024, over 90 pyrolysis plants were operating or under construction globally, representing approximately £3.2 billion in cumulative investment since 2020. The UK's Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme, fully implemented in 2025, now mandates that producers fund the full net costs of managing packaging waste, creating powerful financial incentives for demonstrable recycling solutions. Under these regulations, producers face packaging recovery note (PRN) costs that can exceed £400 per tonne for hard-to-recycle plastics—costs that chemical recycling proponents argue their technologies can help offset.
Investment patterns reveal both optimism and caution. Venture capital funding for chemical recycling startups peaked at £1.1 billion globally in 2022 before declining to £680 million in 2024, reflecting investor scepticism about commercial viability timelines. Meanwhile, corporate commitments to recycled content—with brands like Unilever, Nestlé, and PepsiCo pledging 25-50% recycled plastic by 2025—have created demand signals that exceed current supply capacity by an estimated factor of five. This supply-demand mismatch has enabled some operators to command premium prices for chemically recycled output, whilst simultaneously incentivising questionable claims about recycled content through mass balance accounting methodologies.
The regulatory landscape continues to tighten. The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), finalised in 2024, establishes mandatory recycled content targets of 10% by 2030 and 35% by 2040 for contact-sensitive plastic packaging. For the UK, post-Brexit alignment decisions on chemical recycling definitions and mass balance accounting standards will significantly impact whether investments made today generate returns or become stranded assets.
Key Concepts
Pyrolysis
Pyrolysis involves heating plastic waste to temperatures between 400-700°C in the absence of oxygen, breaking polymer chains into shorter hydrocarbon molecules. The resulting pyrolysis oil can theoretically substitute for virgin naphtha in steam crackers, producing new plastic monomers. However, actual yields vary dramatically based on feedstock composition—mixed post-consumer plastics typically yield only 50-65% usable oil, with significant portions lost to char, wax, and non-condensable gases. Energy consumption ranges from 1.5-3.5 MJ per kilogram of feedstock, raising questions about net carbon benefits when grid electricity remains fossil-dependent.
Gasification
Gasification operates at higher temperatures (700-1500°C) and converts plastic waste into synthesis gas (syngas)—a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. While gasification can process more contaminated feedstocks than pyrolysis, the additional processing steps required to convert syngas back into plastics significantly reduce overall efficiency. Current gasification-to-plastic pathways recover only 15-30% of carbon content as new polymer, making the technology more suitable for fuel production than circular plastics applications.
Solvolysis
Solvolysis uses chemical solvents to selectively break specific polymer bonds, enabling true monomer recovery for certain plastic types. PET depolymerization via glycolysis or methanolysis can achieve 90%+ monomer yields with high purity, making it the most genuinely circular chemical recycling pathway. However, solvolysis remains polymer-specific—effective for PET and some polyamides but currently impractical for polyolefins (PE and PP), which constitute 54% of plastic waste.
AI-Powered Sorting
Advanced sorting systems using computer vision, near-infrared spectroscopy, and machine learning algorithms now achieve identification accuracies exceeding 95% for common polymer types at speeds of 3,000+ items per minute. These systems can distinguish between food-grade and non-food-grade materials, identify multilayer packaging structures, and detect contaminants that would compromise downstream recycling quality. The economic case for AI sorting has strengthened considerably—systems that cost £250,000-400,000 per unit typically pay back within 18-30 months through improved material recovery rates and reduced contamination penalties.
Mass Balance Accounting
Mass balance accounting allows companies to allocate recycled content across product portfolios based on input quantities rather than physical traceability. Under this approach, a company processing 1,000 tonnes of plastic waste through a cracker can claim recycled content across multiple products even when molecular mixing makes physical tracking impossible. Critics argue this enables "book and claim" schemes where recycled content certificates change hands without corresponding physical material flows, potentially undermining consumer trust and regulatory intent. The ISCC PLUS certification standard has emerged as the dominant mass balance framework, though verification challenges persist.
Chemical Recycling KPI Benchmarks
| Metric | Current Industry Average | Best-in-Class | Target by 2030 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pyrolysis oil yield | 55-60% | 75% | 80%+ |
| Energy intensity (MJ/kg) | 2.5-3.0 | 1.2 | <1.0 |
| Carbon efficiency | 35-45% | 60% | 70%+ |
| Feedstock contamination tolerance | <5% | 15% | 20%+ |
| Operating cost (£/tonne) | £400-600 | £280 | £200 |
| AI sorting accuracy | 92% | 98% | 99%+ |
| Downtime percentage | 25-35% | 12% | <8% |
| GHG emissions (kg CO2e/kg output) | 2.8-3.5 | 1.4 | <1.0 |
What's Working and What Isn't
What's Working
PET depolymerization at commercial scale: Eastman's Kingsport, Tennessee facility now processes 110,000 tonnes of PET waste annually using methanolysis, achieving 90%+ monomer recovery rates. The resulting recycled PET meets food-contact standards and has secured offtake agreements with major cosmetics and beverage brands. Loop Industries' enzymatic PET depolymerization technology, licensed to partners including SK Chemicals, demonstrates that biotechnology approaches can complement thermochemical methods for specific polymer streams.
AI sorting accuracy improvements: AMP Robotics' Cortex system now operates in over 150 material recovery facilities globally, processing 80+ items per minute per robot with 99% accuracy for targeted materials. Greyparrot's waste analytics platform, deployed across 50+ European facilities, provides real-time compositional analysis that enables dynamic sorting adjustments and quality verification. These systems have demonstrated 15-25% improvements in material recovery rates compared to manual sorting, with particular gains in capturing high-value engineering plastics and separating look-alike materials.
Integrated refinery partnerships: BASF's ChemCycling programme has successfully integrated pyrolysis oil from Plastic Energy and other partners into existing steam crackers at Ludwigshafen, demonstrating technical feasibility at industrial scale. The collaboration model—where chemical recyclers focus on feedstock preparation whilst petrochemical majors handle downstream processing—appears more viable than fully integrated standalone plants.
What Isn't Working
Energy intensity and carbon accounting: Independent lifecycle assessments consistently show that current pyrolysis operations consume 2-4 times more energy than virgin plastic production when feedstock collection, sorting, and processing are fully accounted. A 2024 study by the Royal Society of Chemistry found that pyrolysis-derived plastics generate 2.8 kg CO2e per kg of output versus 1.9 kg CO2e for virgin HDPE when European grid electricity is used. Only facilities powered by renewable energy or waste heat achieve genuine carbon benefits.
Yield losses and quality degradation: The gap between laboratory yields and commercial performance remains substantial. A 2024 audit of 12 European pyrolysis plants found average oil yields of 52%, significantly below the 70-80% figures commonly cited in investor presentations. Contaminants including chlorine from PVC, flame retardants, and food residues create processing challenges that reduce throughput and increase maintenance costs.
Greenwashing and accountability gaps: Several high-profile chemical recycling ventures have faced allegations of exaggerated claims. Investigative reporting by Reuters in 2024 documented instances where facilities claiming to recycle plastics were instead burning pyrolysis oil as fuel—a lower-value application that does not displace virgin plastic production. The lack of standardised, independently verified tracking systems enables such practices to persist.
Key Players
Established Leaders
BASF (Germany): Through its ChemCycling programme, BASF processes pyrolysis oil from partner facilities to produce certified circular plastics. The company has secured mass balance certification for over 50 product grades and has committed €100 million to expand chemical recycling partnerships through 2027.
Eastman (USA): Operating the world's largest PET molecular recycling facility, Eastman has invested $1 billion in methanolysis capacity with plans to expand into France. Their Tritan Renew and Cristal Renew product lines achieve 50% certified recycled content for durable goods applications.
Plastic Energy (UK/Spain): A pioneer in pyrolysis technology, Plastic Energy operates commercial plants in Seville and Almeria processing 33,000 tonnes annually. Strategic partnerships with ExxonMobil and TotalEnergies have funded expansion into France and the Netherlands.
Emerging Startups
AMP Robotics (USA): Valued at over $500 million following 2024 funding rounds, AMP Robotics deploys AI-powered sorting robots across North America and Europe. Their Clarity analytics platform provides MRF operators with real-time performance data and predictive maintenance capabilities.
Greyparrot (UK): Using computer vision and machine learning, Greyparrot's waste analytics systems monitor 50+ billion waste items annually. Their technology enables EPR compliance verification and has attracted investment from Procter & Gamble Ventures and IKEA's venture arm.
Mura Technology (UK): Developing hydrothermal plastic recycling using supercritical water, Mura has commissioned a 20,000-tonne capacity plant at Wilton, Teesside. The HydroPRS process claims to handle mixed, contaminated plastics with lower energy consumption than conventional pyrolysis.
Key Investors & Funders
Closed Loop Partners: This circular economy-focused investment firm has deployed over $200 million into advanced recycling infrastructure, including stakes in Novoloop, PureCycle Technologies, and multiple MRF automation projects.
UK Research and Innovation (UKRI): Through the Smart Sustainable Plastic Packaging Challenge, UKRI has funded £60 million in collaborative R&D projects addressing chemical recycling scalability and sorting technology development.
Breakthrough Energy Ventures: Bill Gates' climate-focused fund has invested in several chemical recycling ventures, including Solugen and BioCellection, focusing on technologies with demonstrated carbon reduction potential.
Myths vs Reality
Myth 1: Chemical recycling can process all plastics that mechanical recycling cannot
Reality: Chemical recycling technologies are highly feedstock-dependent. Pyrolysis performs best with polyolefins (PE, PP) but struggles with PVC contamination, which generates corrosive hydrochloric acid. Solvolysis works for PET and some polyamides but not polyolefins. No single chemical recycling technology can handle the full diversity of plastic waste streams. Pre-sorting and feedstock preparation remain critical—and costly—prerequisites.
Myth 2: Chemical recycling achieves true circularity
Reality: Current carbon efficiency rates of 35-50% mean that the majority of plastic carbon exits the system as fuel, char, or emissions rather than new plastic. True circularity—where plastic-to-plastic conversion approaches 100%—remains technically and economically distant for most chemical recycling pathways. Only PET solvolysis currently approaches genuinely circular performance.
Myth 3: AI sorting will eliminate the need for better packaging design
Reality: While AI sorting dramatically improves material recovery, fundamental packaging design decisions—multilayer structures, incompatible material combinations, small format items—still defeat even advanced sorting systems. The industry consensus increasingly recognises that design-for-recycling standards must complement downstream sorting investments to achieve systemic improvements.
Myth 4: Mass balance accounting ensures genuine recycled content
Reality: Mass balance enables recycled content claims without physical traceability, creating potential for misleading marketing. Without robust chain-of-custody verification, consumers cannot distinguish products made with recycled molecules from those carrying only accounting credits. Stronger certification standards and third-party auditing are essential to maintain market integrity.
Myth 5: Chemical recycling is commercially proven at scale
Reality: Despite billions in announced investments, actual operational capacity remains limited. Many facilities operate significantly below nameplate capacity due to feedstock quality issues, technical challenges, and market conditions. The industry remains in a scale-up phase where unit economics are not yet proven at the levels required for widespread adoption.
Action Checklist
- Conduct due diligence on feedstock composition and contamination levels before investing in chemical recycling assets—actual yields depend heavily on input quality
- Require third-party verified lifecycle assessments that include full Scope 3 emissions before making recycled content procurement commitments
- Evaluate AI sorting investments as essential complements to chemical recycling capacity—sorting quality directly determines downstream economics
- Demand transparent mass balance chain-of-custody documentation with independent auditing when purchasing chemically recycled materials
- Monitor EPR fee structures and recycled content mandates across target markets, as regulatory shifts will significantly impact competitive positioning
- Assess energy sourcing strategies for chemical recycling facilities—only renewable-powered operations achieve meaningful carbon benefits
FAQ
Q: What is the current global capacity for chemical recycling? A: As of late 2024, operational chemical recycling capacity stands at approximately 1.2 million tonnes annually, representing less than 0.3% of global plastic production. Announced capacity exceeds 10 million tonnes by 2030, but historical project completion rates suggest actual delivery will be significantly lower.
Q: How does the cost of chemically recycled plastic compare to virgin material? A: Chemically recycled plastics currently command premiums of 50-150% over virgin equivalents, driven by limited supply and corporate sustainability commitments. Production costs of £400-600 per tonne significantly exceed virgin polyolefin costs of £800-1,200 per tonne at current oil prices, requiring either continued premiums or substantial efficiency improvements.
Q: Can chemical recycling help meet UK EPR recycled content requirements? A: The UK Environment Agency currently recognises mass-balance-certified chemical recycling outputs as contributing to recycled content targets, though verification requirements continue to evolve. Companies should monitor regulatory guidance closely as enforcement mechanisms develop.
Q: What role does AI sorting play in chemical recycling economics? A: AI-powered sorting systems improve feedstock quality by removing contaminants and separating polymer types, directly increasing pyrolysis yields and reducing operational costs. Studies indicate that facilities using advanced sorting achieve 15-20% better economics than those relying on manual sorting alone.
Q: How should investors evaluate chemical recycling opportunities given current market conditions? A: Focus on ventures with proven operational track records, secured feedstock agreements, and transparent independent yield verification. Prioritise technologies with demonstrated pathways to positive unit economics without premium pricing, and assess management teams for realistic timelines versus promotional optimism.
Sources
- Ellen MacArthur Foundation. "The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the Future of Plastics." 2024 Progress Report.
- Royal Society of Chemistry. "Chemical Recycling: Lifecycle Assessment and Carbon Accounting." November 2024.
- UK Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. "Extended Producer Responsibility for Packaging: Implementation Guidance." January 2025.
- European Commission. "Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR): Final Text and Technical Annexes." June 2024.
- Reuters Special Investigation. "The Recycling Myth: Where Does Your Plastic Really Go?" September 2024.
- ISCC Plus. "Mass Balance Certification Standard: Requirements and Verification Procedures." Version 3.2, 2024.
- Closed Loop Partners. "Accelerating Circular Supply Chains: Advanced Recycling Market Report." Q3 2024.
Related Articles
Deep dive: Chemical recycling & advanced sorting — the fastest-moving subsegments to watch
What's working, what isn't, and what's next — with the trade-offs made explicit. Focus on KPIs that matter, benchmark ranges, and what 'good' looks like in practice.
Data story: key signals in Chemical recycling & advanced sorting
The 5–8 KPIs that matter, benchmark ranges, and what the data suggests next. Focus on unit economics, adoption blockers, and what decision-makers should watch next.
Case study: Chemical recycling & advanced sorting — a sector comparison with benchmark KPIs
A concrete implementation with numbers, lessons learned, and what to copy/avoid. Focus on implementation trade-offs, stakeholder incentives, and the hidden bottlenecks.