Sustainability Atlas
Crypto & Web3·15 min read··...

Operational playbook: scaling Tokenization & real-world assets (RWAs) from pilot to rollout

A step-by-step rollout plan with milestones, owners, and metrics. Focus on incentive design, regulatory surface area, and measurable real-world outcomes.

The tokenized real-world asset market grew from $5 billion in 2022 to over $30 billion by Q3 2025—a 500% increase in three years. BlackRock's BUIDL fund alone surpassed $2.5 billion in assets under management within 18 months of launch, while tokenized U.S. Treasuries surged 539% from January 2024 to April 2025. Yet for every successful deployment, dozens of pilots stall at proof-of-concept. The difference between projects that scale and those that languish comes down to three factors: incentive design that aligns all stakeholders, regulatory architecture that anticipates compliance requirements, and measurable outcomes that justify continued investment. This playbook provides the operational framework for engineering teams moving RWA tokenization from experimentation to production.

Why It Matters

Tokenization transforms illiquid assets—real estate, private credit, commodities, securities—into programmable, fractional, and globally transferable digital instruments. For engineers building financial infrastructure, this represents both a technical challenge and a generational opportunity to reshape capital markets.

The economic case is compelling. BlockTower and Centrifuge demonstrated 97% cost reduction in securitization operations by moving structured credit workflows on-chain. Traditional securitization involves 15-20 intermediaries, each extracting fees and introducing settlement delays. Smart contracts collapse this stack, enabling T+0 settlement instead of T+2, eliminating reconciliation overhead, and providing real-time transparency for all participants.

The market is moving rapidly. As of mid-2025, 86% of institutional investors had exposure to or planned investment in digital assets. Tokenized private credit commands 58-61% market share at $14-17 billion, while tokenized U.S. Treasuries represent 30-34% at $7-8 billion. Provenance and Ethereum together host over 80% of tokenized assets, with $12.5 billion and $12.3 billion respectively.

For U.S. engineering teams, the regulatory environment is transitioning from enforcement-driven ambiguity to structured oversight. The SEC's July 2025 "Project Crypto" initiative, the CFTC's December 2025 no-action relief for digital asset collateral, and the advancing CLARITY Act signal that compliant tokenization infrastructure will define the next generation of capital markets technology.

Key Concepts

Token Standards and Compliance

Security tokens require standards that enforce transfer restrictions, investor verification, and regulatory holds. ERC-1400 and ERC-3643 have emerged as dominant frameworks for compliant tokenization. Unlike ERC-20 tokens designed for permissionless transfer, these standards embed compliance logic directly into the token contract—whitelisting approved addresses, enforcing lock-up periods, and integrating KYC/AML verification.

Securitize's architecture demonstrates production-grade implementation: tokens exist on public blockchains (Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, and others), while a compliance layer maintains an off-chain registry of verified investors. Transfers between whitelisted addresses execute instantly on-chain; transfers to non-verified addresses revert. This hybrid model preserves blockchain's settlement efficiency while satisfying securities law requirements.

Incentive Design for Stakeholder Alignment

Successful RWA projects structure incentives across four stakeholder categories:

Asset Originators need reduced capital costs and faster time-to-market. Tokenization delivers value when origination-to-liquidity timelines compress from months to days and when fractional issuance expands the investor base beyond traditional institutional minimums ($5-10 million) to accredited thresholds ($10,000-$100,000).

Investors seek yield, liquidity, and transparency. Tokenized Treasuries like Ondo's USDY deliver 4.25-4.29% APY with 24/7 transferability—something impossible with traditional T-bills requiring brokerage intermediation. On-chain portfolios provide real-time NAV visibility rather than quarterly statements.

Service Providers (custodians, transfer agents, compliance vendors) capture fees in a disintermediating environment by becoming infrastructure layers. Anchorage Digital, BitGo, and Fireblocks have positioned themselves as custody solutions for tokenized securities, earning basis points on assets under custody.

Regulators require investor protection, market integrity, and systemic risk monitoring. Projects that provide transparent on-chain audit trails, enforce accreditation requirements, and maintain clear issuer accountability reduce regulatory friction and accelerate approvals.

Regulatory Surface Area

U.S. tokenization projects must navigate overlapping jurisdictions:

SEC Jurisdiction: Tokenized securities (equity, debt, fund interests) fall under existing securities laws. Reg D (506b/506c) exemptions enable private placements to accredited investors. ATS (Alternative Trading System) licenses permit secondary trading on regulated platforms. As of 2025, Securitize, tZERO, and INX operate SEC-registered broker-dealers and ATS platforms.

CFTC Jurisdiction: Tokenized commodities and derivatives require CFTC compliance. The December 2025 no-action relief now permits futures commission merchants (FCMs) to accept digital assets—including tokenized money market funds—as margin collateral.

State-Level Considerations: Wyoming and Texas have enacted legislation recognizing blockchain registries for property rights. State money transmitter licenses may apply depending on token characteristics and transfer mechanics.

MiCA (EU Context): While U.S.-focused, engineering teams building global products should note that MiCA's December 2024 full enforcement creates a unified EU licensing regime. Tokens qualifying as transferable securities fall under MiFID II rather than MiCA, requiring prospectus filings and investment firm authorization.

What's Working

BlackRock BUIDL: Institutional-Grade Treasury Tokenization

BlackRock's USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL) represents the benchmark for institutional RWA deployment. Launched in March 2024 on Ethereum via Securitize, BUIDL holds short-term U.S. Treasuries, cash, and repurchase agreements, maintaining a $1 per token stable value with daily dividend accrual.

The technical architecture demonstrates production patterns: Bank of New York Mellon provides traditional custody for underlying securities; Securitize manages tokenization, transfer agent functions, and investor verification; Wormhole enables cross-chain interoperability across nine blockchains including Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, and Avalanche. By November 2025, BUIDL had expanded to BNB Chain and achieved acceptance as trading collateral on Binance—illustrating how tokenized instruments can integrate into DeFi infrastructure while maintaining institutional compliance.

Measurable outcomes: $2.5 billion AUM in 18 months, 24/7 transferability between verified investors, and instant settlement versus T+1 for traditional money market funds.

Centrifuge and BlockTower: Private Credit Automation

BlockTower's structured credit fund with Centrifuge and MakerDAO demonstrates how tokenization can transform illiquid markets. The $220 million deployment allocated $150 million senior capital from MakerDAO (the DAI stablecoin issuer) and $70 million junior capital from BlockTower, creating an on-chain waterfall structure enforced by smart contracts.

Traditional securitization requires constant spreadsheet tracking of payment priorities, manual covenant monitoring, and quarterly reporting cycles. Centrifuge's smart contracts automate these workflows: 30% equity buffer requirements execute programmatically, interest payments distribute according to tranche seniority without manual intervention, and real-time dashboards replace opaque quarterly statements.

The fund returned capital in October 2024 with a 24% return, validating the operational model. More significantly, the deployment achieved 97% cost reduction in securitization operations—transforming the economics of private credit from institutional-only scale ($50+ million minimums) to accessible thresholds.

Ondo Finance: Permissionless Treasury Access

Ondo Finance's USDY (US Dollar Yield) token illustrates permissionless tokenization for non-U.S. investors. Backed by short-term Treasuries and bank deposits, USDY delivers approximately 4.25% APY with daily rebasing—holders earn yield without staking or manual claims.

The technical implementation spans eight blockchains (Ethereum, Solana, Sei, Mantle, Sui, Aptos, XRP Ledger, Arbitrum), demonstrating multichain deployment at scale. Ondo's September 2025 launch of Ondo Global Markets extended the model to tokenized U.S. equities and ETFs, achieving $320 million TVL within weeks.

Regulatory navigation proved critical: USDY is explicitly unavailable to U.S. persons, enabling permissionless transfers without Reg D constraints. The SEC closed its investigation of Ondo in November 2025, providing clarity for the operating model. For engineering teams, Ondo demonstrates how geographic restrictions can be encoded at the smart contract level while maintaining composability with DeFi protocols.

What's Not Working

Custody and Collateral Rule Ambiguity

Despite CFTC progress, U.S. banks and broker-dealers face persistent uncertainty around digital asset custody. SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (SAB 121) requires entities to record customer crypto holdings as liabilities on their balance sheets—a treatment that dramatically increases capital requirements and has prevented major banks from offering custody services.

While SAB 121 relief has been discussed, full resolution is projected for 2026 or later. Engineering teams building institutional-grade infrastructure must design for a transitional period where qualified custodians (Anchorage, BitGo, Coinbase Custody) bridge the gap, adding complexity and cost to otherwise streamlined tokenization workflows.

Smart Contract and Oracle Risk

Tokenized RWAs depend on off-chain data: asset valuations, payment receipts, collateral status, and issuer solvency. Oracle failures or manipulation can propagate incorrect data on-chain, triggering inappropriate liquidations or misrepresenting asset values.

The August 2023 default of tokenized loans on Centrifuge demonstrated these risks: when underlying borrowers failed to repay, the on-chain representation lagged real-world status, temporarily putting MakerDAO's investment at risk. While improved MRV (Measurement, Reporting, Verification) protocols have emerged, engineering teams must implement robust oracle architectures with multiple data sources, dispute resolution mechanisms, and graceful degradation when off-chain data becomes unavailable.

Liquidity Fragmentation

Tokenized assets trading across nine blockchains sounds like interoperability success—but liquidity fragmentation remains problematic. A BUIDL token on Ethereum cannot directly trade against BUIDL on Solana without bridge protocols, introducing additional smart contract risk and settlement delays.

Secondary market liquidity for most tokenized securities remains thin. While BlackRock's BUIDL benefits from institutional demand and market maker support, smaller issuances struggle to achieve the trading volumes necessary for meaningful price discovery. Engineering teams should plan for extended illiquidity in pilot phases and design redemption mechanisms that don't depend on active secondary markets.

The legal treatment of tokenized assets in issuer bankruptcy remains untested in U.S. courts. If a tokenized security issuer enters Chapter 11, do token holders have the same priority as traditional shareholders? Are tokens property or contract rights? These questions lack definitive answers, creating risk that sophisticated institutional investors price into their participation requirements.

Projects mitigate this through legal structure: Securitize uses Delaware statutory trusts and SPVs that isolate tokenized assets from issuer bankruptcy estates. Engineering teams should coordinate closely with legal counsel to ensure smart contract logic aligns with the chosen legal wrapper and that token holder rights are enforceable in traditional court proceedings.

Key Players

Established Leaders

Securitize — SEC-registered broker-dealer, transfer agent, and ATS operator. Tokenization platform for BlackRock BUIDL, Apollo, Hamilton Lane, and KKR funds. Announced SPAC merger in October 2025 at $1.25 billion valuation with expected Nasdaq listing (ticker: SECZ) in January 2026.

Provenance Blockchain — Purpose-built L1 for financial services RWA tokenization. Hosts $12.5 billion in tokenized assets (42% market share), primarily private credit and fund interests. Developed with Figure Technologies.

Chainlink — Decentralized oracle network providing CCIP (Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol) for RWA transfers across blockchains. Powers data feeds for asset valuations, proof-of-reserves, and NAV calculations.

Centrifuge — Infrastructure for on-chain asset management with $1.3 billion+ tokenized assets distributed. Whitelabel platform launched November 2025 for institutional self-service tokenization.

Emerging Startups

Ondo Finance — Tokenized Treasury and equity platform. $1.6 billion TVL across USDY, OUSG, and Ondo Global Markets. SEC investigation closed November 2025.

Maple Finance — Institutional lending protocol for tokenized private credit. Facilitates on-chain corporate loan origination with transparent borrower terms.

Superstate — Registered investment company offering tokenized Treasury fund (USTB) on Ethereum. Led by Compound Finance founder Robert Leshner.

Backed Finance — EU-regulated tokenized securities including bIBTA (iShares Treasury Bond ETF). Demonstrates MiCA-compliant issuance structure.

Key Investors & Funders

Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) — Lead investor in Securitize, Centrifuge, and multiple RWA infrastructure projects. a16z Crypto fund has deployed significant capital into tokenization infrastructure.

ParaFi Capital — Early investor in Centrifuge, Maple Finance, and DeFi protocols integrating RWAs.

European Investment Bank — Issued tokenized bonds on Ethereum, demonstrating sovereign-level adoption of blockchain settlement.

Digital Currency Group (DCG) — Parent company of Grayscale with investments across RWA infrastructure providers.

Action Checklist

  1. Select token standard based on jurisdiction and asset class. ERC-3643 for institutional securities requiring granular transfer restrictions; ERC-1400 for simpler compliance needs. Evaluate whether your target blockchains support the chosen standard natively or require wrapper contracts.

  2. Map your regulatory surface area before writing code. Document whether tokens constitute securities (SEC), commodities (CFTC), or fall under state money transmission laws. Engage securities counsel to confirm exemption strategy (Reg D 506c for U.S. accredited investors; Reg S for non-U.S. distribution).

  3. Architect oracle infrastructure with redundancy. Implement multi-source data feeds for asset valuations using Chainlink or equivalent. Design circuit breakers that halt transfers if oracle data diverges beyond acceptable thresholds. Plan for manual override capabilities when automated feeds fail.

  4. Establish qualified custody relationships early. Onboard with Anchorage Digital, BitGo, Coinbase Custody, or equivalent before launch. Custody integration typically requires 8-12 weeks for due diligence, technical integration, and operational testing.

  5. Build compliance into transfer logic, not as an afterthought. Implement whitelisting at the smart contract level. Integrate with identity verification providers (Jumio, Onfido, or Securitize's compliance API) to automate investor accreditation checks before wallet approval.

  6. Design redemption mechanisms that don't depend on secondary market liquidity. Include issuer redemption windows, NAV-based buyback calculations, and clear timelines. Token holders should understand liquidity pathways from day one.

  7. Implement comprehensive event logging for regulatory audit trails. Every transfer, redemption, and dividend distribution should emit events that can be queried and exported for regulatory reporting. Consider on-chain attestations for off-chain asset verification.

  8. Plan multichain deployment from the architecture phase. Even if launching on a single chain, design contracts for eventual cross-chain expansion via Wormhole, Chainlink CCIP, or LayerZero. Avoid chain-specific dependencies that would require contract rewrites.

FAQ

Q: How do we handle KYC/AML for tokenized securities without compromising user privacy?

A: Production implementations use a separation of concerns model. Identity verification occurs off-chain with regulated providers (Jumio, Persona, or Securitize's compliance stack). Upon successful verification, the compliance provider adds the investor's wallet address to an on-chain whitelist—no personal data touches the blockchain. Smart contracts check whitelist membership before allowing transfers. For privacy-preserving alternatives, zero-knowledge proofs can attest to accreditation status without revealing identity, though ZK-KYC remains early-stage for securities applications. The key principle: identity data stays off-chain; authorization status lives on-chain.

Q: What's the minimum viable infrastructure for a pilot tokenization project?

A: A production-worthy pilot requires five components: (1) Token smart contracts implementing ERC-1400 or ERC-3643 with transfer restrictions; (2) Compliance integration for investor verification and whitelist management; (3) Qualified custody for underlying assets (partner with established custodians rather than building in-house); (4) Legal wrapper (typically a Delaware SPV or statutory trust) that creates enforceable property rights for token holders; (5) Administrative interface for issuance, redemption, and reporting. Expect 4-6 months from architecture to initial deployment for a well-resourced team. Budget $500K-$1.5M for legal, compliance, and infrastructure costs before the first token mints.

Q: How should engineering teams approach blockchain selection for RWA tokenization?

A: Prioritize ecosystem maturity over theoretical throughput. Ethereum remains the default for institutional deployments due to Securitize, custody provider, and DeFi integration depth. Solana offers lower fees and faster finality but has fewer production RWA precedents. Provenance serves private credit specifically with native financial services primitives. For multichain strategies, design contracts to deploy identically across EVM chains (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Polygon) with minimal modification. Interoperability protocols like Wormhole and Chainlink CCIP enable cross-chain transfers but introduce bridge risk—evaluate whether your liquidity needs justify that complexity.

Q: What metrics should we track to demonstrate pilot success and justify scaling investment?

A: Focus on four categories: (1) Operational efficiency—measure time-to-settlement, reconciliation hours eliminated, and error rates versus traditional processes (BlockTower achieved 97% cost reduction); (2) Investor engagement—track unique wallet holders, secondary market trading volume, and redemption request frequency; (3) Compliance performance—monitor failed transfer attempts (indicating transfer restriction enforcement), KYC completion rates, and regulatory inquiry response times; (4) Technical reliability—uptime percentages, oracle data freshness, and smart contract gas efficiency. Present these metrics in investor-familiar terms: basis points saved, days reduced in settlement cycles, and percentage improvement in reporting accuracy.

Q: How do tokenized securities interact with existing portfolio management and accounting systems?

A: Integration requires bridging on-chain token data with traditional systems. Most institutional investors use portfolio management systems (Bloomberg AIM, BlackRock Aladdin, SimCorp) that expect CUSIP/ISIN identifiers and SWIFT messaging. Engineering teams should implement (1) data export APIs that map token holdings to standard security identifiers; (2) event listeners that translate on-chain transfers into booking entries for accounting systems; (3) NAV calculation feeds compatible with traditional fund administration workflows. Securitize and similar platforms provide institutional connectors, but custom integration work is typically required. Plan for 2-3 months of integration testing with pilot investors' back-office systems.

Sources

The transition from RWA pilot to production deployment separates experimental technology projects from institutional-grade financial infrastructure. Engineering teams that master compliance-embedded token design, robust oracle architectures, and stakeholder-aligned incentive structures will build the capital markets systems that define the next decade. The $30 billion tokenized today represents less than 0.1% of the addressable market. The operational playbook is clear—execution determines who captures the remaining opportunity.

Topics

tokenizationrealL2 rollupsMRVtraceabilitygovernancecapex

Related Articles