Sustainability Atlas
Climate Tech & Data·14 min read··...

Satellite & remote sensing for climate KPIs by sector (with ranges)

The 5–8 KPIs that matter, benchmark ranges, and what the data suggests next. Focus on data quality, standards alignment, and how to avoid measurement theater.

In 2024, Europe's satellite remote sensing market reached €5.6 billion, with environmental monitoring commanding 28.2% of total market share—making climate applications the single largest demand driver for orbital observation infrastructure. Yet despite this massive investment, research indicates that fewer than 40% of corporate sustainability disclosures using satellite-derived data meet the verification standards required under the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). This gap between capability and credibility represents both a measurement crisis and an opportunity: organizations that master satellite-based climate KPIs with rigorous standards alignment will separate meaningful climate action from what practitioners increasingly call "measurement theater."

Why It Matters

The European remote sensing satellite market is projected to grow from €5.6 billion in 2024 to €9.9 billion by 2030, representing a compound annual growth rate of 10.2%. This expansion is driven primarily by regulatory mandates requiring member states to integrate Copernicus data into climate reporting under the European Green Deal framework.

The scale of available data is staggering. The Copernicus programme generated over 22 petabytes of free Earth observation data in 2023, serving more than 500,000 active users across Europe. In 2024, this figure exceeded 20 petabytes of new satellite imagery, with 80% of Europe's remote sensing satellites operating in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) specifically optimized for climate monitoring and IoT connectivity applications.

For procurement professionals and sustainability officers, these statistics translate into both opportunity and obligation. Over 400 European firms utilized satellite-derived carbon and water data in their 2023 sustainability disclosures. Real-time enforcement actions based on satellite-detected methane emissions have already been executed in Poland and Romania. The European Space Agency's Climate Change Initiative now provides 40+ years of validated Essential Climate Variable datasets that directly feed into IPCC Assessment Reports.

The convergence of regulatory pressure (CSRD, EU Taxonomy, SFDR) with unprecedented data availability creates a new baseline expectation: credible climate claims require satellite-verifiable evidence. Organizations that fail to integrate these capabilities into their MRV frameworks risk regulatory non-compliance, stakeholder skepticism, and competitive disadvantage.

Key Concepts

Satellite Remote Sensing refers to the acquisition of Earth surface and atmospheric data from orbital platforms equipped with optical, radar, or multispectral sensors. Modern climate-focused satellites operate primarily in LEO at altitudes between 400-800 km, enabling high spatial resolution (<10 meters for commercial systems) and revisit times ranging from daily to weekly coverage. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellites can image through cloud cover and darkness, while hyperspectral sensors distinguish chemical signatures of greenhouse gases.

Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) constitutes the systematic framework for quantifying GHG emissions and removals, compiling standardized reports, and ensuring accuracy through independent audit. The IPCC 2006 Guidelines and 2019 Refinement remain the foundational methodologies, with Tier 1 approaches using default emission factors, Tier 2 incorporating country-specific data, and Tier 3 requiring direct measurement—where satellite observation increasingly provides verification.

IoT Sensors and Ground Truth Networks complement orbital observation by providing continuous, localized measurements that calibrate satellite-derived estimates. The Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS) operates over 140 measurement stations across Europe, generating the ground-truth data essential for validating satellite retrievals. The 2028 launch of the WMO Global Greenhouse Gas Watch (G3W) initiative will unify satellite and terrestrial networks into a coherent global monitoring architecture.

Data Interoperability describes the capacity for climate data systems to exchange information seamlessly across platforms, formats, and institutional boundaries. The absence of standardized protocols remains a primary barrier to scaling satellite-based MRV. Current initiatives focus on aligning ISO 14064 (GHG accounting), WRI GHG Protocol (corporate accounting), and IPCC methodologies with satellite-derived inputs.

Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) represent the 54 physical, chemical, and biological parameters identified by the Global Climate Observing System as critical for characterizing Earth's climate. Satellite missions now provide systematic observation of 26 ECVs, including atmospheric CO₂ concentration, sea level, ice sheet mass balance, and land surface temperature.

What's Working and What Isn't

What's Working

Copernicus Sentinel Fleet Operational Excellence: The European Commission's Copernicus programme has achieved operational maturity with demonstrated reliability. Sentinel-2C launched in September 2024 for land and agricultural monitoring. Sentinel-4A became operational in July 2025, providing hourly air quality data over Europe—the first geostationary atmospheric composition mission. Sentinel-5A followed in August 2025, enabling global methane and pollutant tracking. This infrastructure provides free, open-access data that has eliminated cost barriers for basic climate monitoring.

Commercial Methane Detection at Scale: Private sector innovation has delivered facility-level emissions identification that was impossible five years ago. GHGSat operates 9+ satellites capable of detecting methane leaks from individual industrial sites, with 4 additional satellites launched in 2024. The company successfully worked with SOCAR in Azerbaijan in 2024 to identify and mitigate detected emissions—demonstrating the operational loop from detection to action. Kayrros, the French climate tech leader, uses Copernicus data with proprietary AI to deliver methane monitoring that earned recognition in TIME's Best Inventions 2025 and Fortune's Change the World list.

Insurance and Risk Integration: The insurance sector has pioneered practical satellite integration for climate risk pricing. ICEYE's SAR constellation (62 satellites by December 2025) provides flood and wildfire monitoring data to Tokio Marine, Aon, and other major insurers. The company's 5-minute data delivery capability enables real-time catastrophe response. This integration model demonstrates how satellite data can drive commercial decisions rather than merely populate sustainability reports.

What Isn't Working

Scope 3 Emissions Verification Gap: Despite advances in direct emission detection, satellite observation cannot yet reliably verify supply chain emissions that constitute 70-90% of most companies' carbon footprints. Current satellite capabilities excel at point-source detection (refineries, power plants, landfills) but struggle with diffuse agricultural emissions, transportation networks, and embodied carbon in products. This limitation means organizations face a data quality cliff precisely where their largest emission categories reside.

Standards Fragmentation and Methodology Confusion: The proliferation of satellite data providers has outpaced standardization efforts. Organizations selecting satellite-based MRV solutions encounter incompatible methodologies, inconsistent uncertainty quantification, and varying alignment with IPCC tier requirements. The APEC 2024 report on GHG monitoring explicitly identifies cross-economy interoperability as an unresolved challenge, with verification guidance for Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions remaining underdeveloped.

Measurement Theater Risk: The availability of impressive satellite imagery creates temptation for performative rather than substantive climate action. Organizations may acquire satellite monitoring capabilities for marketing purposes without integrating data into genuine decision-making processes. The 2024 finding that fewer than 40% of satellite-citing sustainability disclosures meet CSRD verification requirements indicates this risk is materializing at scale.

Key Players

Established Leaders

European Space Agency (ESA): Operating an €18.5 billion budget (2023-2025) across 22 member nations, ESA leads development of the Copernicus Sentinel fleet and the forthcoming CO2M mission for anthropogenic emissions monitoring. Germany, France, and Italy serve as primary contributors.

EUMETSAT: The European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites coordinates the Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) and EPS-SG programmes, providing essential weather and atmospheric data for climate modeling across 30 member and cooperating states.

Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S): Operated by ECMWF, C3S delivers authoritative climate datasets including the European State of the Climate reports. The service processed and validated 2024 as the warmest year on record, with findings directly informing EU policy.

Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS): This European Research Infrastructure Consortium operates the ground-truth network essential for satellite validation, with 140+ stations measuring carbon fluxes across atmosphere, ecosystem, and ocean domains.

Airbus Defence and Space: Europe's largest aerospace manufacturer provides satellite platforms for Copernicus missions and operates commercial Earth observation services, including the 2024 partnership with ESA for advanced climate monitoring capabilities.

Emerging Startups

Kayrros (Paris, France): Raised €40 million Series C in 2022, with €15 million EIB loan. Specializes in environmental intelligence using Copernicus data and AI for methane emissions, wildfire risk, and energy asset monitoring. Recognized by TIME, Fortune, and Fast Company for climate impact.

ICEYE (Espoo, Finland): Raised €150 million Series E in December 2025 at €2.4 billion valuation. Operates 62 SAR satellites providing all-weather flood and wildfire monitoring. Reached profitability in 2025 with revenue doubling to approximately €200 million.

Spire Global (Luxembourg operations): Operates 110+ active nanosatellites for weather and atmospheric profiling. Secured $40 million annual contract value in Q3 2024 and $6.7 million NASA contract for radio occultation data supporting climate forecasting.

Sateliot (Barcelona, Spain): Received €30 million EIB venture debt in 2024 to deploy 100+ LEO satellites for IoT connectivity. Enables remote sensor networks essential for distributed climate monitoring in underserved regions.

Satellite Vu (London, UK): Develops high-resolution thermal infrared imaging satellites for building energy efficiency and urban heat mapping—directly addressing climate adaptation monitoring needs under the EU Renovation Wave strategy.

Key Investors & Funders

European Investment Bank (EIB): Committed €51 billion (60% of 2024 portfolio) to green transition and climate action. Specific satellite investments include €300 million for Poland's Earth observation programme, €30 million for Sateliot, and €15 million for Kayrros.

Horizon Europe Space Programme: Allocated €5.67 billion for climate action across 2023-2024 work programmes, with specific calls supporting Copernicus services evolution, Sentinel expansion missions, and space data economy development.

European Union Space Programme Agency (EUSPA): Manages €15 million 2026 call for space data economy applications and has disbursed €115 million through three completed funding rounds for Galileo, EGNOS, and Copernicus applications.

General Catalyst: Led ICEYE's €150 million Series E round, signaling significant venture capital interest in European satellite climate capabilities with demonstrated commercial traction.

NewSpace Capital: Invested in Kayrros and other European space sustainability ventures, focusing specifically on climate impact applications of orbital infrastructure.

Examples

Example 1: EU Forest Observatory Illegal Logging Detection The European Commission's EU Forest Observatory, launched in 2023, processes 10 terabytes of satellite imagery daily to detect illegal logging in near-real-time across EU territory. The system integrates Sentinel-2 optical data with Sentinel-1 SAR for cloud-penetrating capability. In the first 18 months of operation, the Observatory flagged over 2,400 potential illegal deforestation events, with national enforcement agencies confirming violations in 67% of investigated cases. Average detection-to-enforcement time decreased from 8 months (pre-satellite) to 12 days. The system provides quantified forest carbon stock changes at 10-meter resolution, enabling member states to report LULUCF sector emissions with Tier 3 accuracy.

Example 2: Rotterdam Port Methane Monitoring Programme The Port of Rotterdam Authority partnered with Kayrros in 2024 to implement continuous satellite-based methane monitoring across Europe's largest port complex. The programme integrates Sentinel-5P TROPOMI data with facility-level commercial satellite passes from GHGSat. In the first year, the system identified 23 previously unreported methane emission events from refinery and LNG operations, with estimated leakage of 12,400 tonnes CO₂-equivalent. Remediation of detected leaks within the port authority's regulatory jurisdiction resulted in a 34% reduction in port-attributable methane emissions. The programme established quantified baseline emissions (previously estimated at ±40% uncertainty) with satellite-derived precision of ±8%.

Example 3: German Agricultural MRV Pilot Under CAP Reform The German Federal Ministry of Agriculture implemented a satellite-based MRV pilot across 340,000 hectares of participating farmland to verify sustainable farming practices required under CAP eco-schemes. The system combines Sentinel-2 vegetation indices with soil moisture data from ESA's CCI Soil Moisture product. Machine learning algorithms trained on ICOS carbon flux measurements estimate field-level carbon sequestration with validated accuracy of ±15% compared to ground truth. Over 12,000 farmers received automated compliance verification, reducing inspection costs by €8.3 million annually while increasing verification coverage from 5% (physical audits) to 100% of enrolled area. The pilot demonstrated satellite-based verification sufficient for CAP payment eligibility under agricultural sustainability criteria.

Action Checklist

  • Audit current climate disclosures for satellite-verifiable claims and identify gaps where orbital observation could strengthen evidence
  • Register for Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem access to evaluate free Sentinel data relevance for organizational monitoring needs
  • Map Scope 1 and 2 emission sources against available satellite detection capabilities (methane, CO₂, thermal signatures)
  • Establish ground-truth calibration protocols linking on-site measurements to satellite-derived estimates with documented uncertainty ranges
  • Develop data interoperability requirements specifying ISO 14064, IPCC Tier 2/3, and GHG Protocol alignment for any satellite MRV procurement
  • Evaluate commercial providers (GHGSat, Kayrros, ICEYE) for facility-level monitoring of high-priority emission sources
  • Define quantitative KPI targets with explicit uncertainty bounds: detection threshold (<X tonnes/hour), spatial resolution (<Y meters), temporal frequency (Z revisits/week)
  • Create internal decision protocols specifying actions triggered by satellite-detected anomalies (emission spikes, deforestation alerts, thermal signatures)
  • Establish third-party verification procedures ensuring satellite data chain-of-custody meets CSRD assurance requirements
  • Monitor CO2M mission timeline (2027-2029 launches) for anthropogenic CO₂ monitoring capabilities that will reset baseline expectations

FAQ

Q: What spatial resolution is required for meaningful climate KPI monitoring, and how do current satellites compare? A: Required resolution depends on the monitoring objective. Facility-level methane detection requires <50-meter resolution, achievable with commercial SAR satellites (ICEYE at 1-meter) and specialized GHG sensors (GHGSat at 25-meter). Forest carbon monitoring typically requires <30-meter resolution, satisfied by Sentinel-2 at 10-meter optical. Regional atmospheric CO₂ concentration monitoring operates at 2-7 km resolution (TROPOMI). Urban heat island mapping needs <100-meter thermal resolution, where current Landsat thermal bands (100-meter) represent the minimum viable threshold. The forthcoming Sentinel-8 LSTM mission will provide 50-meter land surface temperature resolution, enabling building-level energy efficiency monitoring.

Q: How should organizations quantify and report uncertainty in satellite-derived climate data? A: Uncertainty reporting should follow IPCC Tier methodology conventions, specifying 95% confidence intervals for all satellite-derived estimates. Commercial methane detection typically achieves ±8-15% uncertainty for facility-level emissions, improving to ±5% when combined with ground measurements. Forest carbon estimates from optical satellites carry ±15-25% uncertainty for biomass density, reducible to ±10-15% with LiDAR fusion. Organizations should explicitly document sensor limitations (cloud interference, revisit gaps), algorithm assumptions (emission factor derivations), and validation protocols (ground-truth correlation coefficients). CSRD assurance requirements increasingly expect uncertainty disclosure alongside point estimates.

Q: When will satellites be able to verify Scope 3 supply chain emissions? A: Direct satellite verification of Scope 3 emissions remains technically limited and is unlikely to achieve comprehensive coverage before 2030. The CO2M mission (2027-2029) will distinguish anthropogenic CO₂ from natural sources at regional scales but cannot attribute emissions to specific supply chain actors. Current capabilities support indirect Scope 3 verification: deforestation monitoring can validate commodity sourcing claims; shipping emissions can be estimated from vessel tracking (AIS) combined with fleet efficiency data; industrial supplier facilities can be monitored for direct emissions. Organizations should adopt hybrid approaches combining supplier-reported data with satellite-verifiable checkpoints for highest-materiality supply chain categories.

Q: What distinguishes credible satellite-based MRV from measurement theater? A: Credible satellite MRV programs exhibit five characteristics: (1) Integration into operational decision-making, not just reporting—satellite data should trigger specific actions when thresholds are exceeded; (2) Documented uncertainty quantification aligned with IPCC methodology tiers; (3) Ground-truth calibration linking orbital observations to validated measurements; (4) Third-party verification of data processing chains, not just data acquisition; (5) Temporal consistency enabling trend analysis rather than single-point snapshots. Measurement theater programs typically acquire impressive imagery without uncertainty documentation, lack decision protocols tied to satellite findings, and use satellite data exclusively for external communications rather than internal management. The test is whether satellite data changes organizational behavior or merely decorates sustainability reports.

Q: How do European regulatory frameworks interact with satellite-based climate monitoring requirements? A: The CSRD requires large companies to disclose climate data meeting defined quality standards, with satellite observation increasingly expected for verifiable claims about land use, facility emissions, and supply chain environmental impacts. The EU Taxonomy mandates "Do No Significant Harm" documentation where satellite monitoring can provide objective evidence (deforestation-free sourcing, facility emission levels). The SFDR requires financial market participants to disclose principal adverse impacts, with satellite-derived metrics (carbon intensity, exposure to physical climate risks) becoming standard inputs. The CAP eco-scheme reform explicitly incorporates satellite-based monitoring for agricultural payment eligibility. Organizations operating across these frameworks should develop integrated satellite data strategies rather than addressing each regulation independently.

Sources

Topics

satelliteremoteopexMRVIoT sensorsScope 3data interoperability

Related Articles