Sustainability Atlas
Chemistry & Materials Science·12 min read··...

Trend analysis: Green ammonia, fertilizers & industrial chemistry — where the value pools are (and who captures them)

Signals to watch, value pools, and how the landscape may shift over the next 12–24 months. Focus on KPIs that matter, benchmark ranges, and what 'good' looks like in practice.

The green ammonia market exploded from approximately $290–520 million in 2024 to projections exceeding $654 million in 2025, with compound annual growth rates ranging from 62% to 83% depending on the source (Fortune Business Insights, 2025; GM Insights, 2025). This trajectory positions the sector to reach between $18 billion and $86 billion by 2032–2034, making it one of the fastest-growing segments in industrial decarbonisation. For policy and compliance professionals, particularly in the UK, understanding where value pools are forming—and who is positioned to capture them—is essential for regulatory planning, investment screening, and Scope 3 emissions strategy. This analysis examines the signals, benchmarks, and landscape shifts expected over the next 12–24 months.

Why It Matters

Ammonia production accounts for approximately 2% of global CO₂ emissions, releasing roughly 500 million tonnes of CO₂ annually through the conventional Haber-Bosch process powered by natural gas or coal (Royal Society, 2020). This is not a marginal industrial chemistry problem: ammonia underpins 40–50% of global food production through nitrogen fertilisers, making decarbonisation both urgent and technically complex.

For UK policy professionals, the stakes are particularly acute. The closure of CF Fertilisers' Billingham ammonia plant—first temporarily halted in 2022 and proposed for permanent closure in 2023 due to natural gas costs exceeding £2,000 per tonne compared to global prices around £1,000—illustrates how carbon pricing and energy economics are reshaping domestic production (CF Industries, 2023). The UK's pivot toward becoming an ammonia import and hydrogen conversion hub rather than a production centre creates distinct regulatory and supply chain considerations.

The fertiliser sector dominates green ammonia applications, accounting for 44–50% of end-use demand. However, maritime fuel applications are accelerating rapidly, driven by the International Maritime Organisation's 2050 net-zero shipping targets and interim goals for 70–80% emissions reduction by 2040. This dual demand structure creates compounding growth dynamics that policy frameworks must anticipate.

Key Concepts

The Green Ammonia Value Chain

Green ammonia production replaces fossil-derived hydrogen with hydrogen generated via water electrolysis powered by renewable electricity. The process chain comprises four integrated stages: renewable power generation, water electrolysis, nitrogen separation from air, and ammonia synthesis (typically still via Haber-Bosch, though novel electrochemical routes are emerging).

Production Cost Economics: Current green ammonia production costs range from $600–1,200 per tonne, compared to $200–350 for conventional grey ammonia (BloombergNEF, 2024). The cost premium stems primarily from electrolyser capital expenditure (capex) and renewable electricity costs. However, electrolyser costs have declined 40% since 2020, with further reductions anticipated as manufacturing scales.

Electrolysis Technologies

Three primary electrolysis technologies compete for market share:

TechnologyMarket Share (2024)Key Characteristics
Alkaline Water Electrolysis (AWE)55–96%Most mature; lowest cost; dominant for large-scale projects
Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM)~44% (some sources)High efficiency (>90%); flexibility with intermittent renewables
Solid Oxide Electrolysis (SOEC)EmergingHighest efficiency potential; heat integration benefits

Value Pool Distribution

Value capture in green ammonia distributes across four primary segments:

  1. Electrolyser Manufacturing: High-margin, technology-protected segment dominated by Siemens Energy, Nel ASA, ITM Power, and Thyssenkrupp.
  2. Project Development: Large-scale integration requiring capital access, permitting expertise, and offtake agreements.
  3. Ammonia Synthesis Integration: Retrofitting existing Haber-Bosch facilities or deploying modular synthesis systems.
  4. Distribution and Offtake: Logistics infrastructure, storage terminals, and long-term purchase agreements.

Sector-Specific KPI Benchmarks

KPIBenchmark RangeWhat "Good" Looks Like
Levelised cost of ammonia (LCOA)$600–1,200/tonne<$500/tonne by 2030
Electrolyser capacity factor40–65%>70% with hybrid renewable sources
Carbon intensity (kg CO₂/kg NH₃)0.1–0.5 (green) vs 2.0–2.4 (grey)<0.1 with renewable-only power
Capex per tonne annual capacity$1,500–3,000<$1,000 at scale
Time to project FID3–5 years<2 years for modular systems
Offtake agreement duration10–20 years15+ years for bankability

What's Working and What Isn't

What's Working

Integrated Renewable-to-Ammonia Projects: Yara International's Herøya plant in Norway, which became operational in mid-2024, demonstrates the viability of renewable hydrogen integration at scale. The 24 MW electrolyser delivers 41,000 tonnes of CO₂ reduction annually and has begun supplying low-carbon fertilisers to European markets (Yara, 2024).

Carbon Capture Hybrid Approaches: CF Industries' Blue Point complex in Louisiana, approved for final investment decision in April 2025, represents a $4 billion commitment to 1.4 million tonnes per year of low-carbon ammonia with 95% CO₂ capture. The joint venture with JERA and Mitsui secures export channels to Japan and demonstrates bankable blue ammonia pathways (CF Industries, 2025).

Modular Distributed Production: Cambridge-based Nium raised $3 million in 2024 for its nanocatalyst-based modular reactor system targeting hydrogen producers initially. Similarly, Copenhagen's NitroVolt secured €3.5 million for its container-sized "Nitrolyzer" units designed for on-farm ammonia production, addressing distribution cost challenges (AgFunder, 2024; EU-Startups, 2024).

Strategic Offtake Agreements: Yara Clean Ammonia's deal with India's Greenko ZeroC for 100,000 tonnes per annum by 2024, scaling to 3.1 million tonnes by 2026, exemplifies how binding offtake agreements de-risk project finance and accelerate deployment.

What Isn't Working

UK Domestic Production: The permanent closure of CF Fertilisers' Billingham ammonia plant exposes the fundamental challenge of UK-based production. Natural gas costs remain structurally higher than competing regions, while renewable electricity costs have not declined sufficiently to close the competitiveness gap. The UK's domestic ammonia output declined approximately 3% in 2024.

Scaling Electrochemical Synthesis: While startups like Ammobia (which raised $4.2 million in 2024) are advancing novel electrochemical pathways that bypass conventional Haber-Bosch, most remain at laboratory or early demonstration scale. Ammobia's milestone of 10 grams per day in May 2024, targeting 1 kilogram per day demonstrations, illustrates the gap between innovation promise and commercial relevance.

Policy-Dependent Economics: Air Products' cancelled £2 billion UK hydrogen project demonstrates how policy uncertainty undermines capital deployment. Projects requiring 15–20 year investment horizons cannot proceed without stable regulatory frameworks, carbon pricing certainty, and infrastructure commitments.

Green Premium Absorption: End-users, particularly in agriculture, remain price-sensitive. The 2–3x cost premium for green ammonia over grey equivalents limits adoption without policy mandates, carbon pricing pass-through mechanisms, or differentiated product labelling that commands consumer premiums.

Key Players

Established Leaders

Yara International (Norway): The world's largest ammonia producer with approximately 8 million tonnes annual capacity. Yara operates the first commercial-scale renewable hydrogen plant at Herøya and is developing ammonia import infrastructure in Germany (3 million tonnes per year capacity opened 2024). Revenue of $13.9 billion in 2024.

CF Industries (USA): World's largest ammonia producer by volume. Leading blue ammonia development via the $4 billion Blue Point project with JERA and Mitsui. Operating carbon capture projects at Donaldsonville and Yazoo City targeting 2.5 million tonnes CO₂ annually. Revenue of $13.9 billion in 2024.

Siemens Energy (Germany): Dominant electrolyser manufacturer supplying large-scale green hydrogen projects globally. Technology partnerships across major green ammonia developments including Air Products' NEOM project in Saudi Arabia.

Thyssenkrupp Nucera (Germany): Leading alkaline water electrolysis technology provider with significant market share in large-scale projects. Key supplier to integrated green ammonia developments.

Emerging Startups

Ammobia (San Francisco): Raised $4.2 million in 2024 from Starlight Ventures, Chevron Technology Ventures, and Collaborative Fund. Developing next-generation Haber-Bosch synthesis with 1,000x lower capex potential.

NitroVolt (Copenhagen): Secured €3.5 million in 2024 from BackingMinds and Denmark's sovereign wealth fund EIFO. Electrochemical "Nitrolyzer" units targeting on-farm distributed production.

Nium (Cambridge, UK): Raised $3 million led by AgFunder with DCVC participation. Modular nanocatalyst reactors ("minions") enabling decentralised ammonia synthesis.

Jupiter Ionics (Australia): Completed $9 million Series A in 2024 with Wesfarmers Chemicals, Breakthrough Victoria, and Tenacious Ventures. Electrochemical modular systems for agricultural markets.

Amogy (USA): Previously raised $139 million in Series B; targeting $90 million Series C in 2024. Ammonia-to-power technology for maritime and trucking applications.

Key Investors and Funders

Breakthrough Energy Ventures: Bill Gates-backed fund with significant green ammonia portfolio exposure including technology and project investments.

JERA Co. Inc. (Japan): Strategic investor and offtaker with 35% stake in CF Industries' Blue Point project. Driving ammonia import demand for Japanese power sector co-firing.

Mitsui & Co. (Japan): Minority stake in Blue Point plus 28% stake in Yara's Project Yuri in Australia. Active across hydrogen and ammonia value chains.

European Innovation Council: €1.6 million grant to NitroVolt for demonstration unit development, exemplifying public funding for early-stage technology.

Examples

  1. Yara Herøya, Norway: Yara's renewable hydrogen plant opened mid-2024, integrating a 24 MW electrolyser with existing ammonia synthesis. The facility eliminates 41,000 tonnes of CO₂ emissions annually and demonstrates commercial-scale renewable integration. First low-carbon fertiliser products reached European markets in late 2024, establishing the premium green fertiliser segment (Yara, 2024).

  2. CF Industries Blue Point Complex, USA: Approved in April 2025, this $4 billion joint venture with JERA and Mitsui will produce 2.8 million tonnes annually of low-carbon ammonia with 95% carbon capture by 2029. The project exemplifies bankable blue ammonia economics through integrated CCS, long-term Japanese offtake, and US Inflation Reduction Act 45Q tax credits. It represents the largest low-carbon ammonia facility globally once operational (CF Industries, 2025).

  3. ITM Power Humber H2ub, UK: Signed FEED contract in June 2025 for 120 MW electrolyser capacity at Killingholme using six 20 MW POSEIDON modules. While not directly ammonia production, the project anchors UK hydrogen infrastructure that will convert imported ammonia to hydrogen for industrial clusters—illustrating the UK's strategic pivot from ammonia production to conversion (ITM Power, 2025).

Action Checklist

  • Map Scope 3 exposure to ammonia-based fertilisers across agricultural supply chains and assess supplier decarbonisation trajectories
  • Evaluate carbon pricing scenarios (UK ETS, EU CBAM) on fertiliser procurement costs and contract structures through 2030
  • Assess port infrastructure developments at Immingham, Liverpool, and Humberside for ammonia import and hydrogen conversion capacity
  • Review offtake agreement structures from major producers (Yara, CF Industries, Air Products) for low-carbon ammonia availability and pricing terms
  • Monitor electrolyser manufacturing capacity expansions and technology cost trajectories from ITM Power, Nel ASA, and Siemens Energy
  • Engage with industry consortia (Ammonia Energy Association, Hydrogen Council) for standards development and regulatory advocacy

FAQ

Q: How does green ammonia differ from blue ammonia, and which is more commercially viable in the near term?

A: Green ammonia uses hydrogen from water electrolysis powered by renewable electricity, achieving near-zero carbon intensity (0.1–0.5 kg CO₂/kg NH₃). Blue ammonia uses conventional natural gas-based hydrogen production but captures and stores the resulting CO₂, typically achieving 85–95% emissions reduction. Blue ammonia is more commercially viable near-term due to lower production costs ($350–500/tonne versus $600–1,200 for green) and the ability to retrofit existing assets. CF Industries' Blue Point project and Yara's Sluiskil CCS demonstrate blue pathways at scale. Green ammonia becomes competitive where renewable electricity costs fall below $30/MWh and electrolyser capex declines continue.

Q: What are the implications of the UK's shift from ammonia production to import and conversion?

A: The UK's strategic pivot creates several regulatory and supply chain considerations. First, import dependency increases supply security risks, requiring diversified sourcing from multiple regions (MENA, US Gulf Coast, Australia). Second, the development of ammonia cracking infrastructure at ports (Immingham, Liverpool) creates new permitting and safety regulatory requirements. Third, carbon accounting for imported ammonia under CBAM-equivalent mechanisms requires robust certification and traceability systems. Fourth, domestic fertiliser production remains viable using imported ammonia, as CF Fertilisers continues ammonium nitrate production at Billingham using imported feedstock.

Q: What unit economics must improve for green ammonia to achieve cost parity with grey ammonia?

A: Three variables dominate the green ammonia cost stack: electrolyser capex (30–40% of levelised cost), renewable electricity price (35–45%), and capacity factor/utilisation (affecting capex amortisation). Electrolyser costs must decline from current $500–800/kW to approximately $200–300/kW. Renewable electricity must fall below $25–30/MWh on a baseload-equivalent basis. Capacity factors must exceed 70% through hybrid solar-wind configurations or grid-connected supply. Simultaneously, carbon pricing above $100/tonne CO₂ equivalent would close the remaining gap through grey ammonia cost increases rather than green cost decreases.

Q: How should procurement teams evaluate green ammonia certifications and claims?

A: Credible green ammonia certification requires three elements: verified renewable electricity sourcing (temporal and geographic matching), audited electrolyser efficiency and carbon intensity, and chain-of-custody documentation through the value chain. The CertifHy scheme in Europe provides one framework, while the Hydrogen Council's certification proposals offer additional guidance. Procurement teams should require third-party verification, reject unbundled or annualised renewable energy certificate (REC) claims, and specify carbon intensity thresholds (typically below 0.5 kg CO₂/kg NH₃) in contract specifications. Book-and-claim systems for mass balance approaches require particular scrutiny regarding additionality and temporal matching.

Q: What are the key regulatory developments to monitor over the next 24 months?

A: Five regulatory developments warrant close monitoring: (1) EU CBAM implementation phases affecting fertiliser imports and requiring embedded carbon declarations; (2) UK Hydrogen Strategy revisions and support mechanism details for production and infrastructure; (3) IMO MEPC decisions on ammonia as marine fuel including safety regulations and port handling standards; (4) US IRA guidance on 45V clean hydrogen production tax credit eligibility and life-cycle emissions methodologies; and (5) certification and labelling standards from bodies like ISCC and CertifHy that define "green" thresholds for commercial claims.

Sources

Topics

greenammoniacapexpolymersunit economicsprocess chemistryScope 3

Related Articles