Sustainability Atlas
Sustainable Consumption·12 min read··...

Playbook: adopting Food & household consumption choices in 90 days

A step-by-step rollout plan with milestones, owners, and metrics. Focus on instability risks, monitoring signals, and adaptation planning thresholds.

Only 46% of Europeans are eating sustainably in 2024—down from 51% in 2020—yet food and household consumption accounts for nearly one-third of the EU's total ecological footprint. With the EU Greenwashing Directive (ECGT) enforcement deadline of September 27, 2026 approaching and new organic regulations reshaping supply chains, product and design teams face an urgent window to redesign consumption experiences before regulatory penalties and reputational risks materialise. This playbook provides a structured 90-day rollout plan for integrating sustainable food and household choices into digital products, physical services, and consumer touchpoints across the European market.

Why It Matters

The stakes are substantial and accelerating. EU households generate 54% of the bloc's 58 million tonnes of annual food waste—valued at €132 billion—while meat and dairy production contributes 84% of agricultural emissions despite providing only 35% of calories consumed. The average European's food-related carbon footprint is 1,070 kg CO₂-equivalent per year, with household consumption showing the widest disparity across regions: from 54.76 to 33,062.66 kt CO₂ depending on diet composition and appliance efficiency.

For product teams, three regulatory triggers demand immediate attention:

Greenwashing Directive (ECGT): Effective September 27, 2026, this directive bans generic environmental claims like "eco-friendly," "green," and "climate neutral" without verified substantiation. Self-created sustainability labels not based on third-party certification become illegal. Non-compliance carries significant penalties enforced by Member State authorities.

Green Claims Directive: Expected final agreement in 2025 with 24-month Member State transposition, this regulation introduces mandatory pre-approval for environmental marketing claims, independent third-party audits, and required disclosure of negative environmental impacts alongside positive claims.

EU Organic Regulation 2018/848: From January 1, 2025, imports must comply fully with EU organic standards rather than equivalence systems. This has already disrupted supply chains—60% of Fairtrade-certified organic coffee and cocoa producers do not meet new requirements, and certification costs have jumped 50-200% for many cooperatives.

The business opportunity is equally compelling. While only 17% of European consumers are willing to pay premiums for general sustainable products (down from previous years due to economic pressures), 70% remain willing to pay more for sustainable packaging specifically. The €1.37 trillion European consumer packaged goods market is growing at 3.2% CAGR, with sustainable products capturing disproportionate share growth in categories where claims are verifiable and benefits are tangible.

Key Concepts

Instability Risks

Instability risks are systemic vulnerabilities that can invalidate product sustainability claims overnight. For food and household consumption products, the primary instability risks include:

Regulatory Volatility: The EU's shifting sustainability framework creates compliance uncertainty. The Sustainable Food Systems framework, originally planned for 2022-2024, has been delayed indefinitely. Meanwhile, Member States are implementing national variations—Ireland mandates 30% clinker replacement in public construction projects, while France has phased bans on plastic-wrapped fresh produce.

Supply Chain Disruption: New EU organic compliance requirements have already affected over 800,000 farming families globally. Products sourcing from smallholder cooperatives face immediate supply constraints as 69% of producer organisations struggle to meet upgraded certification costs.

Consumer Trust Erosion: Only 25% of European consumers trust retailers or regulatory authorities on sustainability claims. When 53% of green claims in the EU are found to give vague, misleading, or unfounded information, legitimate products suffer credibility damage from category-wide scepticism.

Monitoring Signals

Product teams must track leading indicators that predict when adaptation planning thresholds have been crossed:

Certification Availability: Track the number of certified suppliers meeting EU organic compliance requirements. When certified supply drops below 80% of procurement needs, alternative sourcing strategies become critical.

Consumer Sentiment Shifts: Monitor quarterly changes in willingness to pay green premiums by category. The current 17% baseline varies significantly—luxury fashion sees 20% premium acceptance while home care shows 47% sustainability consideration but lower conversion.

Regulatory Pipeline: Watch for European Parliament committee votes and Council positions on pending directives. The Green Claims Directive's June 17, 2024 Council vote signalled 24-month implementation timelines.

Adaptation Planning Thresholds

Thresholds define when teams must shift from monitoring to active adaptation:

Threshold 1 - Elevated Attention (>10% variance): When certification costs increase more than 10% or consumer trust metrics decline 5+ percentage points in quarterly surveys, initiate supplier diversification planning.

Threshold 2 - Active Response (>25% variance): When primary supplier certification status becomes uncertain or regulatory guidance conflicts with current labelling practices, execute contingency plans and accelerate reformulation timelines.

Threshold 3 - Strategic Pivot (>50% variance): When category-wide regulatory changes require fundamental product repositioning, initiate portfolio review and consider market exit from non-viable segments.

What's Working

Too Good To Go's Surplus Marketplace

Too Good To Go has saved over 350 million meals from waste cumulatively, with 135 million meals saved in 2024 alone. The platform now serves 100 million registered users across 19 countries through 175,000 active store partnerships. The business model—offering "Surprise Bags" at one-third retail price—converts operational waste into revenue while providing consumers tangible sustainability benefits without premium pricing. The 2025 U.S. expansion showed 67% year-over-year growth, demonstrating that the model transfers successfully across markets with consistent value propositions.

Olio's Community Food Sharing Network

Olio reached 100 million meals rescued in December 2024, building on a network of 7 million users and 130,000 Food Waste Hero volunteers. Unlike transactional surplus models, Olio facilitates peer-to-peer sharing that creates community connections alongside environmental benefits. The model has prevented 177,715 tonnes of CO₂ emissions cumulatively while saving 31 billion litres of water. Major retail partnerships with Tesco, Sainsbury's, and Compass Group UK validate the commercial viability of donation-based approaches at scale.

Danone's B Corp Certification at Scale

Danone achieved global B Corp certification in November 2025, becoming one of the world's largest certified corporations with €31.8 billion in sales across 200+ entities in 60+ countries. The 10-year journey required systematically integrating environmental, social, and governance criteria across diverse business units—demonstrating that large food conglomerates can achieve third-party sustainability verification at enterprise scale. The certification provides regulatory-compliant substantiation for environmental claims while differentiating against competitors facing greenwashing scrutiny.

What's Not Working

Climate Fatigue and Premium Resistance

Despite intensifying climate urgency, European sustainable eating behaviour has declined from 51% in 2020 to 46% in 2024. Economic pressures explain much of this retreat—54% of Europeans are pessimistic about the economy (up 7 points since July 2024) and 52% are worried about personal finances (up 9 points). Germany, Sweden, and the UK each saw 5 percentage point declines in willingness to pay green premiums. Products relying on consumer willingness to absorb cost increases face structural demand constraints.

Generic Sustainability Claims

With 53% of EU green claims providing vague or misleading information and nearly 50% of the EU's 230 eco-labels lacking robust verification, consumers cannot distinguish legitimate sustainability efforts from marketing language. The regulatory response—banning unsubstantiated claims entirely—creates transition costs for products that made good-faith claims without anticipating evidentiary requirements. Teams must now retrofit verification infrastructure or withdraw claims entirely.

Smallholder Supply Chain Disruption

The EU's stricter organic import requirements have created immediate supply crises for products dependent on developing-country sourcing. Sixty percent of Fairtrade-certified organic coffee and cocoa producers, and 95% of small-scale banana producers, do not meet January 2025 compliance requirements. Certification costs have increased 50-200%, making organic certification economically unviable for many cooperatives. Products sourced from affected origins face reformulation requirements or supply chain restructuring within constrained timelines.

Knowledge Gaps Limiting Behaviour Change

Only 46% of European consumers feel they have sufficient knowledge about food sustainability, and just 41% can determine whether food is environmentally friendly. Sixty percent of consumers want to avoid processed foods, but only 25% want to reduce animal products—despite meat and dairy representing the highest-impact category. Products cannot drive sustainable choices when consumers lack the information architecture to make informed decisions.

Key Players

Established Leaders

  • Danone — French multinational with €31.8 billion revenue, achieved global B Corp certification November 2025. Leading integration of sustainability metrics into mainstream food production at scale.
  • Nestlé — World's largest food company, investing in regenerative agriculture across 500,000 farmers and targeting 50% emissions reduction by 2030.
  • Unilever — Anglo-Dutch FMCG giant with 400+ brands, committed to halving virgin plastic use and achieving net-zero emissions across value chain by 2039.
  • Carrefour — French retail leader, launched food transition index tracking 100+ sustainability indicators across 10,000+ products.

Emerging Startups

  • Too Good To Go — Copenhagen-based surplus food marketplace, 100M+ users, 350M meals saved, expanding aggressively into North American markets.
  • Olio — London-based food sharing app, 7M users, 100M meals rescued, pioneering volunteer-powered redistribution at scale.
  • Yuka — French product scanning app with 50M+ users, enabling real-time nutritional and environmental scoring at point of purchase.
  • NotCo — Chilean AI-powered plant-based food company, using machine learning to replicate animal product taste profiles at lower environmental cost.
  • Apeel Sciences — California-based edible coating technology extending produce shelf life 2-3x, reducing food waste at distribution level.

Key Investors & Funders

  • Breakthrough Energy Ventures — Bill Gates-backed fund investing in food system decarbonisation, including alternative proteins and precision fermentation.
  • European Investment Bank — Providing €750M+ for sustainable food system infrastructure and circular economy projects.
  • IKEA Foundation — Committing €150M to regenerative agriculture and sustainable livelihoods in food supply chains.
  • Generation Investment Management — Al Gore co-founded firm backing sustainable consumption leaders including plant-based and waste reduction technologies.

Action Checklist

  1. Audit existing environmental claims (Days 1-14): Review all packaging, marketing materials, and digital content for generic terms banned under ECGT (eco-friendly, green, climate neutral, nature's friend). Document substantiation evidence for each claim or flag for removal.

  2. Map supply chain certification status (Days 15-30): Identify which suppliers hold EU-compliant organic certification under 2018/848 requirements. For affected origins (coffee, cocoa, bananas from developing countries), assess certification timeline feasibility and alternative sourcing options.

  3. Implement consumer transparency infrastructure (Days 31-45): Deploy QR code systems or web links providing detailed claim substantiation accessible at point of purchase. Ensure documentation meets ECGT requirements for accessibility and evidence standards.

  4. Establish monitoring dashboards (Days 46-60): Build tracking systems for certification availability, consumer sentiment metrics, and regulatory pipeline developments. Set alert thresholds at 10%, 25%, and 50% variance levels for key indicators.

  5. Engage third-party verification partners (Days 61-75): Contract with recognised certification bodies (B Corp, EU organic auditors, Rainforest Alliance) for independent verification of environmental claims. Budget for 50-200% certification cost increases where applicable.

  6. Redesign information architecture for consumer decision-making (Days 76-85): Address the 46% consumer knowledge gap by integrating contextual sustainability information into product experiences. Provide concrete impact comparisons rather than abstract environmental metrics.

  7. Stress-test contingency plans (Days 86-90): Simulate supply chain disruption scenarios and regulatory enforcement actions. Validate that adaptation protocols can execute within required timelines.

FAQ

Q: How do we prioritise sustainability investments when only 17% of consumers will pay premiums?

A: Segment by category and benefit type. While general sustainability premiums face resistance, 70% of consumers accept sustainable packaging premiums and 60% consider sustainability when purchasing luxury fashion. Focus investments on categories with demonstrated willingness to pay, and frame sustainability investments as risk mitigation rather than margin expansion—ECGT non-compliance penalties and reputational damage from greenwashing allegations carry quantifiable costs that justify defensive investments.

Q: Our products are already "sustainable" but we lack third-party certification. What's the implementation timeline?

A: Begin immediately. B Corp certification requires minimum 80 points on the B Impact Assessment (median score is 50.9) and takes 12-24 months for most organisations. EU organic certification through Ecocert or similar bodies requires 6-12 months for compliant operations plus ongoing audit cycles. With ECGT enforcement in September 2026, products without third-party verification by mid-2025 face inadequate runway for certification completion before enforcement begins.

Q: How do we maintain supply chain continuity when 60%+ of smallholder organic suppliers face compliance gaps?

A: Develop parallel sourcing strategies. Map which supplier cooperatives have certification upgrade timelines aligned with your product cycles. For suppliers facing 50-200% cost increases, consider direct investment in certification costs as supply chain insurance—Fairtrade advocacy organisations are lobbying for extended transition periods, but product teams should not assume regulatory relief will materialise. Reformulation to non-organic positioning may be necessary for supply-constrained products.

Q: What consumer-facing language replaces banned terms like "eco-friendly" and "climate neutral"?

A: Shift from adjectives to evidence. Instead of "eco-friendly packaging," specify "packaging containing 85% post-consumer recycled content, verified by [certification body]." Replace "climate neutral" claims based on offsets with specific emissions reduction statements: "Production emissions reduced 40% since 2020 through renewable energy transition and logistics optimisation." The regulatory requirement is substantiation—claims must be verifiable through accessible documentation.

Q: How do we measure success in a 90-day adoption programme?

A: Track four metrics: (1) Claim compliance rate—percentage of environmental claims with documented third-party verification, targeting 100% before ECGT enforcement; (2) Supply chain resilience—certified supplier coverage as percentage of procurement volume, maintaining >90% headroom above minimum requirements; (3) Consumer information accessibility—percentage of products with QR-accessible substantiation documentation; (4) Monitoring system completeness—all key instability signals tracked with defined threshold alerts. Success means operational readiness before regulatory deadlines, not sustainability leadership—leadership comes after compliance is secured.

Sources

The window for proactive adaptation is closing. Product and design teams that complete this 90-day playbook secure operational compliance while competitors scramble during enforcement periods. The €132 billion annual food waste opportunity and €1.37 trillion European CPG market reward teams that translate sustainability from marketing language into verified consumer value—before regulators and consumers alike make that translation mandatory.

Topics

foodhouseholdcertificationssupply chaingreenwashingScope 3life-cycle

Related Articles