Gravity as a Universal Decoherence Field
Quick Answer
Gravity may be the reason large objects never appear in quantum superpositions. The Diósi-Penrose hypothesis proposes that gravity is inherently classical, acting as a universal decoherence field that collapses quantum superpositions once they involve sufficient mass. In this view, a mass in a superposition of two locations creates incompatible spacetime curvatures that nature resolves by forcing a collapse. This offers a potential solution to the measurement problem and predicts specific timescales for superposition decay that experiments are now beginning to probe.
Why This Matters
The divide between quantum mechanics and general relativity is the central unsolved problem in fundamental physics. Every attempt to quantize gravity has failed to produce experimentally verified predictions. The Diósi-Penrose approach inverts the problem: instead of making gravity quantum, it proposes that gravity makes quantum mechanics classical at large scales. If true, this would fundamentally reshape our understanding of both theories and explain why we never observe quantum superpositions of everyday objects.
Key Takeaways
- Despite decades of effort, no one has observed quantum properties of gravity, and the graviton remains hypothetical
- Penrose argued that in a conflict between quantum superposition and spacetime geometry, quantum mechanics must break first, proposing gravity-induced wavefunction collapse
- The collapse timescale follows τ ≈ ℏ/ΔE_G, where ΔE_G is the gravitational self-energy difference between superposed mass configurations
- For macroscopic objects, this timescale is incredibly short, explaining why cats and billiard balls never appear in superpositions
- Experimental tests are now possible using levitated nanoparticles, optomechanics, and entanglement witnesses, with results expected within the next decade
- A successful detection of gravitational entanglement would rule out the classical gravity hypothesis, making these experiments decisive
The Basics
The Quantum Gravity Puzzle
Modern physics rests on two extraordinary theories: quantum mechanics governs the very small, while general relativity governs gravity and the large-scale structure of spacetime. Each succeeds spectacularly in its own domain, yet they conflict when combined. Physicists have long expected gravity must have an underlying quantum description, with gravitational force mediated by quantized units called gravitons.
However, all attempts to quantize gravity remain unverified. String theory, loop quantum gravity, and other approaches have not produced experimentally confirmed predictions. Gravity stands out by never having shown quantum behavior in experiments: spacetime appears smooth and deterministic at all accessible scales. The weakness of gravity is a major hurdle, with effects so tiny at quantum scales that any putative quantum properties are extraordinarily difficult to detect.
This absence of evidence has led some physicists to question the underlying assumption. Perhaps gravity cannot exist in quantum superposition. Perhaps instead of quantizing gravity, we need to "gravitize" quantum mechanics.
Penrose's Insight
Roger Penrose pioneered this alternative approach. He argued that when a mass is placed in a quantum superposition of two locations, it would try to create a corresponding superposition of two spacetime curvatures. But general relativity "dislikes" this scenario: spacetime geometry should be well-defined, not in superposition.
Beyond some threshold, Penrose argues, nature finds a resolution: the superposition spontaneously collapses to a single outcome, making spacetime definite again. In Penrose's famous formulation, when linear quantum superposition conflicts with geometric rigidity of Einstein's gravity, "quantum will crack first."
Hungarian physicist Frigyes Károlyházy had earlier proposed similar ideas, and Lajos Diósi independently formulated a dynamical collapse model tied to gravity. This collection of ideas is now called the Diósi-Penrose (DP) model of gravity-related wavefunction collapse.
What is Decoherence?
Decoherence is the process by which a quantum system's ability to exist in superposition gives way to classical outcomes. When a quantum system becomes strongly linked to its environment, it can no longer maintain the delicate phase relationships between its possible states. The system stops behaving quantum mechanically and starts behaving classically.
Every quantum system inevitably interacts with its surroundings: stray air molecules, light, thermal radiation, gravitational fields. In these interactions, information about the system "leaks" into the environment. The environment essentially performs continuous measurements on the system, suppressing quantum interference.
Standard decoherence explains why we don't see superpositions of everyday objects, but it doesn't explain why measurements have definite outcomes. The wavefunction continues to evolve unitarily in a larger system. Objective collapse theories like Diósi-Penrose go further, proposing that some physical mechanism actually ends the superposition.
Decision Framework
When Gravitational Decoherence Matters
Consider gravity-induced collapse when:
- Studying the quantum-to-classical transition: The DP model provides a quantitative prediction for when superpositions become untenable
- Designing experiments with massive superpositions: The DP timescale sets bounds on how long superpositions of heavy objects can persist
- Exploring alternatives to standard quantum mechanics: If standard approaches to quantum gravity fail, the DP hypothesis offers a radically different path
- Interpreting null results in quantum gravity searches: Failure to find gravitational entanglement could support classical gravity
Calculating the Collapse Timescale
The Diósi-Penrose model predicts a collapse timescale:
τ ≈ ℏ / ΔE_G
Where ΔE_G is the gravitational self-energy difference between the two branches of the superposition. For a mass m delocalized over distance d, this is roughly:
ΔE_G ≈ Gm² / d
For an electron, this gives astronomical timescales, preserving quantum behavior. For a dust grain of 10⁻⁷ g, the collapse happens in microseconds or less. For everyday objects, collapse is virtually instantaneous.
Practical Examples
Example 1: Matter-Wave Interferometry
Consider a neutron interferometer where a neutron beam forms interference fringes while feeling Earth's gravity (the classic 1975 C.O.W. experiment). The experiment observes interference, with gravity simply shifting the pattern by a phase.
Outcome: For neutrons (mass ~10⁻²⁷ kg), Earth's gravity does not collapse the superposition, consistent with the DP model's prediction of extremely slow collapse for small masses. Now imagine scaling up to large proteins (~10⁻²¹ kg) or microscopic beads (~10⁻¹⁵ kg). As mass increases, the hypothesis predicts interference suppression even in perfect vacuum, simply because gravity is measuring the object's position.
Example 2: Gravitational Entanglement Tests
In 2017, physicists Sougato Bose and colleagues proposed an experiment to determine whether gravity is quantum or classical. Two tiny masses (around 10⁻¹⁴ to 10⁻¹⁵ kg, perhaps nanodiamonds) are prepared in superpositions of two locations.
If gravity is quantum, the gravitational interaction between the masses will create entanglement. If gravity is classical, no entanglement will occur. The experimental signature is interference patterns that depend on the other mass's state.
Outcome: If the two masses emerge entangled, gravity must carry quantum information and is thus quantum in nature. If no entanglement is observed under conditions where other decoherence sources are ruled out, gravity may indeed be acting classically, collapsing superpositions rather than participating in quantum correlations.
Example 3: Optomechanical Mirror Superposition
In 2003, Marshall, Penrose, and colleagues proposed placing a small mirror (around 10⁻¹⁰ kg) in a cavity optomechanics setup. A photon "kicks" the mirror into two locations at once (correlated with the photon superposition), and interference in the light reveals whether the mirror remained in superposition.
Outcome: If the mirror's superposition decays faster than standard theory predicts (after accounting for ordinary decoherence), it would hint at gravity-induced collapse. To date, creating macroscopic superpositions is extremely challenging due to environmental decoherence, but experimentalists are pushing boundaries with optically levitated spheres and proposed space-based interferometers.
Thought Experiments
Schrödinger's Space Rock
Imagine a small rock in a superposition of two locations several centimeters apart. As long as no external environment interacts, we might expect quantum behavior. But the rock's gravitational field exists in two distinct configurations: one centered on location A, one on location B.
In a quantum gravity scenario, the field could also be in superposition. In a classical gravity scenario, this cannot happen. The field cannot simultaneously accommodate both configurations. One branch of the superposition must quickly dominate, essentially forcing the rock to "choose" a location. The timescale for this choice follows Penrose's τ formula.
Interference Near a Black Hole
Send particles in superposition of two paths, one passing close to a black hole, the other far away. The path near the black hole experiences much more gravitational potential. If gravity is a decoherer, the extreme gravitational gradient might rapidly destroy quantum coherence, hinting that around intense gravitational phenomena, quantum superpositions are especially short-lived.
Penrose's Frame-Dependent Paradox
Consider a particle in superposition of two heights in a uniform gravitational field. In the particle's rest frame (free-fall), there is no gravity. In the lab frame, gravitational potential difference causes the wavefunctions to accumulate relative phase. Both descriptions should be equivalent.
But for a superposition of heights, Penrose found a subtle inconsistency: a phase difference term appears in one frame that has no counterpart in the other, growing with time cubed. His resolution: beyond a certain time, the superposition becomes untenable and collapses to restore a single spacetime geometry.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Conflating Decoherence with Collapse
Standard decoherence explains why superpositions become practically unobservable but doesn't produce definite outcomes. Objective collapse theories like DP claim something more: a real physical mechanism ends the superposition. These are different claims requiring different evidence.
Mistake 2: Assuming Quantum Gravity is Necessary
The question of whether gravity is quantum remains open. The assumption that all forces must be quantized is not experimentally established. The DP hypothesis takes seriously the possibility that gravity might be the exception.
Mistake 3: Ignoring Environmental Decoherence
Any experiment testing gravitational collapse must first eliminate all other decoherence sources. Stray photons, gas molecules, and thermal radiation can all destroy superpositions. Only after ruling these out can gravitational effects be isolated.
Mistake 4: Treating Null Results as Proof
Failure to observe gravitational entanglement could result from insufficient experimental sensitivity rather than classical gravity. Conversely, observing entanglement would definitively rule out purely classical gravity.
Current Experimental Status
Levitated Nanoparticle Experiments
Researchers are creating quantum superpositions of increasingly massive objects. Recent experiments have demonstrated matter-wave interference with molecules of thousands of atoms. Proposals exist to put nanoparticles or micro-mirrors into spatial superpositions. Projects involving optically levitated spheres or space-based interferometers are in development.
Spontaneous Collapse Searches
Objective collapse models predict slight heating of objects or faint noise from collapse-induced energy injection. Experiments with ultra-sensitive mechanical oscillators have searched for anomalous noise. So far, no conclusive anomaly has been seen; instead, experiments have set upper limits on collapse effects, constraining the parameter space of various models.
Gravitational Entanglement Proposals
The Bose-Marletto-Vedral experiment is conceptually within reach of near-future technology. It requires superb isolation, vacuum, and control of masses for several seconds. Several groups worldwide are working toward realizing this experiment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Would this mean gravity is fundamentally different from other forces?
Yes. Electromagnetism, the weak force, and the strong force are all described by quantum field theories with quantized carriers (photons, W/Z bosons, gluons). If gravity is classical, it would be unique, with no graviton and no ability to exist in superposition.
How does this solve the measurement problem?
The measurement problem asks why observations produce definite outcomes despite quantum superposition. The DP model proposes that gravity automatically collapses superpositions above a certain mass threshold, explaining why we never observe macroscopic superpositions without invoking conscious observers or many worlds.
Why haven't we seen gravitational collapse effects already?
For microscopic particles, the predicted collapse timescales are astronomical. For macroscopic objects, environmental decoherence completely dominates and masks any gravitational effect. Only in the intermediate regime (nanoparticles to microparticles) might gravitational decoherence be distinguishable.
What happens if we detect gravitational entanglement?
If two masses become entangled through gravity alone, gravity must be able to transmit quantum information and therefore must be quantum. This would rule out classical gravity and the DP hypothesis, confirming that gravity should be quantized like other forces.
Action Checklist
- Study the Diósi-Penrose model: Understand the derivation of the collapse timescale and its dependence on mass and separation
- Review experimental proposals: Familiarize yourself with the Bose-Marletto-Vedral entanglement test and optomechanics experiments
- Follow current experiments: Track progress from groups working on levitated nanoparticles and matter-wave interferometry
- Understand decoherence theory: Learn how environmental decoherence differs from objective collapse to properly interpret experimental results
- Consider cosmological implications: Explore how gravitational decoherence might affect early universe cosmology and structure formation
- Engage with the measurement problem: Understand how gravitational collapse fits into the broader landscape of interpretations of quantum mechanics
- Monitor major experimental results: The next decade may produce decisive evidence either confirming or ruling out classical gravity
Sources
-
Physicists Find Way to See Grin of Quantum Gravity - Quanta Magazine (2018)
-
Testing the Diósi-Penrose Model - Physical Review Letters (2020)
-
Towards Quantum Superposition of a Mirror - Marshall et al. (2003)
-
Gravitationally induced entanglement between two massive particles - Bose et al. (2017)
-
The quantum measurement problem - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
-
Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical - Zurek (2003)
-
Testing gravitational decoherence with matter wave interferometry - Nature (2020)
Related Articles
The Quantum Vacuum as an Information Reservoir — Probing Memory Effects in Vacuum Polarization
Quick Answer The quantum vacuum is not empty but seethes with virtual particle-antiparticle pairs constantly appearing and disappearing. Normally, when an exter...
Entropy-Driven Time Dilation — A Thermodynamic Extension of Relativity
Quick Answer Time dilation is established physics: moving clocks run slower, and clocks in gravitational wells tick more slowly. But could there be a third fact...
Information Density as a Source of Gravity
Quick Answer Gravity may not be a fundamental force at all. A growing body of theoretical work suggests gravity could emerge from differences in information den...